Conservation Of Forest Resources In North India Environmental Sciences Essay

Forests are natural umbrellas for land surface because they protect the land surface from eroding by falling raindrops and control radiation balance of the Earth and the ambiance by devouring increased sum of C dioxide released from of all time increasing human vents ( chimneys of the mills ) and therefore forestall the Earth from going excessively hot. Removal of forest screen exposes the land surface to the atmospheric procedures.

Forest is a life resource. A big figure of people of the hills and fields depend on forest resources particularly in the North-Eastern Region of India. It is a renewable resource if decently managed. Deforestation can take topographic point in no clip but coevals of wood takes a long clip to develop into a ego contained feasible ecosystem.Today, there is a great consciousness of the jobs of woods in our state every bit good as in North East India. During the last one decennary the forest screen of the part got depleted at an dismaying rate, hence, saving of wood is a heavy undertaking for the part.

Comprising of eight provinces, viz. ArunachalPradesh, Assam, Manipur, Meghalaya, Mizoram, Nagaland, Sikkim and Tripura ; Northeast India is a mega-biodiversity Centre and a hot spot. The part contains more than one tierce of the state ‘s entire bio-diversity and is one of the 18 recognised bio-diversity hot spots of the universe. It occupies 7.7 % of India ‘s entire geographical country supporting50 % of the vegetation of which 31.58 % is endemic. It is a transitional zone between the Indian, Indo-Barman-Malaysian and Indo-Chinese parts. The part supports a rich biodiversity crossing from tropical rain forests to alpine gown. This rich biodiversity has a important function in the care of the ecosystem.

The part is rich in orchids, ferns, oaks bamboos, rhododendrons ; magnolias etc.With the shrinking of green screen everyplace, the part is besides sing an impact on its ecological system. The major menaces to the rich biodiversity of the part are enlargement of agricultural activities, over-exploitation of woods for firewood, switching cultivation, extended timbering, graze, urbanisation, semisynthetic wood fires, debut of exoticplants, ill-managed route building, excavation, etc. which lead to habitat loss and habitat atomization that finally consequences in biodiversity loss. Natural catastrophes such as landslides, inundations and forest fires besides result in biodiversity loss to some extent. The part is known for its age old institutional mechanisms on cultural and societal values for biodiversity preservation, viz. sacred Grovess or woods in Meghalaya, Manipur and Nagaland ; sacred landscapes in Sikkim and sacred brows in Arunachal Pradesh.Conserved as the residence of local dieties, these ecosystems represent leftovers of ancient woods, but these patterns are quickly disappearing due to modern instruction and transition of faith, which have led to the giving up of traditional and cultural beliefs. India has strengthened its clasp on biodiversity preservation by implementing the Indian Forest Act, 1927 ; the Wildlife ( Protection ) Act, 1972 ; the Forest ( Conservation ) Act, 1980 ; the Environment ( Protection ) Act, 1986 ; the Biodiversity Act, 2002 ; the Biodiversity Rule, 2004, etc.

The northeasterly portion of India, known for its diverse and most extended alcoholic forest screen, is unhappily one of the major parts confronting terrible deforestation. Forests of this part are alone structurally and species composing. It is a meeting part of temperate east Himalayan vegetation, palaeo-arctic vegetation of Tibetan upland and moisture evergreen vegetations of south-east Asia and Yunnan organizing bowl of biodiversity. One of the provinces of this part viz. , Arunachal Pradesh occupies a important topographic point as a melting pot for the development of vegetations in north-east India and for speciation. The Brahmaputra vale sandwiched between Eastern Himalaya in the North, Garo/Khasi/Jaintia and Mikir/Cachar/Barail hills ranges in the South ; is a meeting land of the temperate east Himalayan vegetation and the moisture evergreen and moisture deciduous floristic elements. The Khasi-Jaintia hills map as a corridor of the south-east Asia floristic elements into the Indian subcontinent through the Arakan discharge. The altitudinal fluctuation and rainfall forms of sou’-west and nor’-east monsoon play a important function in the development of ecological niches in this part of India.A

The forest screen of north-east India has been assessed by the authorities at 1, 64,043 sq. kilometer of the entire geographical country of 2,55,083 sq.km. In the provinces of north-east India the heaviest demand on wood is for fuel wood and agricultural lands. The precise of deforestation can non be accurately assessed due to the farness of many countries from which wood is removed and the deficiency of written records for deforestation. The forest country of the provinces like Assam, Meghalaya, Manipur and Mizoram has been cut downing at an dismaying rate. It is to be noted that the forest countries of the fields of the north-east India are well below national norm. In fact during the last few decennaries, there has become a rapid devolution of forest resources in the part which threatened the economic system and ecology of north-east India necessitating the intercession of the supreme tribunal of India.

Harmonizing to an official estimation based on orbiter images ( study study of FSI ) , northeasterly part has 1, 63,799 sq.km of wood, which is about 25 % of the entire wood screen in the state ( Anon. , 2000 ) The direction of the wood has suffered in the recent yesteryear due to coerce on land, diminishing rhythm of switching cultivation, development of wood for lumber and deficiency of scientific direction scheme. The antique pattern of switching cultivation has been a individual factor responsible for the wood and land debasement, thereby altering the landscape extensively. About 0.45 million households in northeasterly part yearly cultivate 10,000 sq.km woods whereas entire country affected by ‘jhumming ‘ is believed to be 44,000 sq.km ( Singh, 1990 ) . Degraded secondary woods, bamboo brushs and weeds or merely bare land dominate today ‘s ‘jhumscapes ‘ ( Toky and Ramakrishnan, 1981 ; Roy and Joshi, 2002 )

Further, the job has been acquiring worse through the indiscriminate felling of trees to fulfill the ever-growing hungriness of industries lasting on forest merchandises such as paper and mush, plyboard, lucifer stick, etc. There is an pressing demand of policy steps to undo the monolithic losingss to the green screen of this part. Unlike other parts of the state administrative control governments of forest screen in Northeast is different. A big portion of the woods in this country autumn under the class of unfastened woods with a crown denseness of 10-40 % and merely few countries qualify as dense woods i.e. of crown denseness of 40 % or higher. Harmonizing to 1995 estimations, these provinces including Arunachal Pradesh, Assam, Meghalaya, Manipur, Mizoram, Nagaland and Sikkim accounted for a loss of 791 sq. km forest country in two old ages viz. from 1993 to 1995 ( FSI, 1996 ) .

Administrative categorization of the forest screen in Northeast India

State

Entire

Reserved

Protected

Unclassified

Entire

Switching Cultivation ( 1987-97 )

Tripura

0.63

0.36

0.05

0.22

0.63

0.06

Sikkim

0.26

0.22

0.03

0.01

0.26

*

Nagaland

0.86

0.01

0.05

0.80

0.86

0.39

Mizoram

1.59

0.71

0.36

0.52

1.59

0.38

Meghalaya

0.95

0.10

0.01

0.85

0.96

0.18

Manipur

1.50

0.14

0.40

0.96

1.50

0.36

Assam

3.07

1.81

0.40

0.86

3.07

0.13

Arunachal Pradesh

5.15

1.53

3.61

0.01

5.15

0.23

Entire

14.01

4.88

4.91

4.23

14.02

1.73

Land Use/Land Cover in Northeast India. ( Beginning: Anon. , 2002a )

Land screen ( Vegetation Type )

States

Area ( km2 )

Area ( % )

Tropical Evergreen Forest

Nagaland, Arunachal Pradesh, Assam, Mizoram, Tripura

5246.202

2.001

Hollong Forest

( Dipterocarpus )

Arunachal Pradesh, Assam

980.87

0.374

Tropical Semi-evergreen Forest

Manipur, Nagaland, Arunachal Pradesh, Assam, Meghalaya, Mizoram

15363.42

5.86

Moist Deciduous Forest

Manipur, Nagaland, Arunachal Pradesh, Assam, Meghalaya, Tripura

19727.24

7.524

Riverain

Arunachal Pradesh

209.36

0.08

Hollock ( Terminalia sp. )

Arunachal Pradesh

108.87

0.042

Sal ( Shorea robusta ) wood

Sikkim, Assam, Meghalaya, Tripura

526.61

0.201

Teak ( Tectona grandis ) Plantation

Assam

15.71

0.006

Dry Deciduous

Forest Manipur

79.00

0.03

Subtropical Evergreen I

Arunachal Pradesh, Meghalaya

20866.83

7.959

Subtropical Evergreen II

Arunachal Pradesh

3559.08

1.358

Sub-Tropical Broad leaved Forest

Mizoram

509.95

0.195

Broad-leaved Hill Forest

Sikkim

1876.18

0.716

Assorted Pine

Meghalaya

1020.07

0.389

Pine Forest

Manipur, Nagaland, Arunachal Pradesh, Assam, Meghalaya

1647.27

0.628

Temperate Broadleaved

Arunachal Pradesh

20785.02

7.928

Assorted Temperate Forest

Nagaland

509.95

0.195

Wet Temperate Forest

Mizoram

448.16

0.171

Temperate Coniferous Forest

Arunachal Pradesh

3190.60

1.217

Fir Forest

Arunachal Pradesh

159.11

0.061

Sub-alpine and Rhododendron

Sikkim, Arunachal Pradesh,

276.35

0.105

A

Entire

97104.60

37.04

Land Cover

States

Area

%

Associated flora type

Abandoned Jhum

Manipur, Nagaland, Arunachal Pradesh, Assam, Meghalaya, Mizoram, Tripura.

20065.36

7.653

Open Bamboo Brakes

Nagaland, Arunachal Pradesh, Meghalaya, Mizoram, Tripura

9501.57

3.624

Degraded Forest

Arunachal Pradesh, Assam, Meghalaya, Mizoram, Tripura

15189.12

5.793

Subalpine and alpine Scrub

Arunachal Pradesh, Sikkim

2654.88

1.013

Alpine Pastures

Arunachal Pradesh, Sikkim

4697.66

1.792

Other Grasslands

Assam, Meghalya

1971.18

0.752

Shrub/Scrub

Assam

581.14

0.222

A

Entire

151765.51

57.89

Groves ( including tea gardens )

Arunachal Pradesh and Assam

6896.67

2.631

Non-forest/Current switching cultivation/Fallow/Barren/ Alpine Barren/Agriculture/ Settlement/Others

Arunachal Pradesh, Assam, Mizoram, Tripura, Nagaland, Sikkim, Manipur, MeghalyaArunachal Pradesh, Sikkim, Manipur

83032.75

31.67

Cloud/Snow/Shadow

A

16164.00

6.165

Water Body

Arunachal Pradesh, Assam, Mizoram, Tripura, Nagaland, Sikkim, Manipur, Meghalya

4320.07

1.648

Entire

A

262179.00

100

Statewise country under wood ( sq. km. ) in 2001: ,

Sl no

State

Geographic country

Entire wood

Dense forest

Open forest

Percentage of forest country to geographical country

1

Arunachal Pradesh

83,743

68,045

53,932

14,113

81.25

2

Assam

78,438

27,714

15,830

11,884

35.33

3

Manipur

22,327

16,926

5,710

11,216

75.81

4

Meghalaya

22,429

15,584

5,681

9,903

69.48

5

Mizoram

21,081

17,494

8,936

8,558

82.98

6

Nagaland

16,579

13,345

5,393

7,952

80.49

7

Tripura

10,486

7,065

3,463

3,602

67.38

Beginning: province of forest study 2001. Quoted in statistical abstract, India, 2002,

Forest screen in northeast India

A reappraisal of the forest screen statistics of nor’-east India reveals some unexpected and contradictory tendencies. Datas from the Forest Survey show an addition in forest screen of 3,398 square kilometres, an one-year rate of 0.5 per centum, for northeast India between 1987 and 1991, and a steady decrease in forest screen of 2,443 square kilometres, an one-year rate of 0.15 per centum, during the 1991-2001 periods. This addition between 1987 and 1991 seems to belie the general perceptual experience of steady forest loss during the last decennaries ( Barik and others 2005 ; Roy and Joshi 2002 ) .

North East India: Changes in Forest Cover 1987-2001

Annual rate of loss of forest screen due to switching cultivation in north-east India:

State

Area affected by switching cultivation in sq. km per twelvemonth

Population dependant on switching cultivation ( 000 )

Arunachal Pradesh

703

270

Assam

700

403

Manipur

500

300

Meghalaya

760

350

Mizoram

600

260

Nagaland

730

400

Tripura

170

100

Beginning: study of the forest study of India,2001

Percentage Annual Change in Forest Cover in North East India 1987-2001

: Ministry of Environment and Forest

State-level informations provide a clearer indicant of the regional tendencies. The information reveal, for the period 1987-1989, a close 4 per centum and over 5 percent addition in forest screen in Arunachal Pradesh and Sikkim severally. This seems implausible since natural regeneration procedures are typically well slower. Equally unlikely is the one-year growing rate for Tripura, which is recorded at about 11 per centum between 1999 and 2001.The grounds for this sudden enlargement in wood screen are ill-defined, though it is suggested that the informations reflect alterations in methodological analysis and graduated table. For case the 2001 informations include all lands with a tree canopy denseness of more than 10 per centum, irrespective of land usage.

Therefore tea plantations, agro- forestry plantations, and fruit groves are all defined as woods. In add-on, a figure of territories antecedently ignored have been included in the appraisals, which likely leads to some additions. Hence the Ministry of Environment and Forests cautiousnesss against temporal comparings as “ technique and graduated table of reading were both different ” ( Ministry of Environment and Forests 2001 ) .

Open and Dense Forest Developments in North East India 1997, 1999 and 2001

THE MAJOR CAUSES OF DEFORESTATION:

Conversion of forest land in agricultural land: Due to the increasing population and subsequent nutrient force per unit area over limited agricultural land, forest land is been brought under cultivation so that agricultural production may be well increased and nutrient may be provided to hungry human population.

Switching or jhuming cultivation: Switching cultivation is a major cause of forest lost in north-east India. The loss of forest screen due to switching cultivation is increasing every twelvemonth

Overgrazing of wood of moderate screen by animate beings has resulted into big scale debasement of natural flora if non the complete devastation of wood. The deforested countries has been worst affected by croping animate beings because no fresh regeneration of works has been allowed by big herds of croping animate beings.

Forest fires: Forest fire whether natural or adult male made is effectual destroyers of forest screens. Atmospheric lightning is the major beginning of natural forest fires besides adult male causes forest fire through his intentional/advertent and unwilled actions. Besides destructing floras, forest fires harden the land surface which decreases the porousness of the dirts and accordingly there is a small infiltration of rain H2O.

Lumbering: Lumbering for domestic and commercial intents is the existent cause of big scale devastation of forest screen. Ever increasing demand of lumber for assorted intents due to industrial enlargement, urban growing and quickly increasing human population has done great harm to natural forest screens.

Multipurpose river undertakings: Multipurpose river undertakings require larger countries to be submerged for the storage of immense volume of H2O in the reservoirs constructed behind the dikes. Therefore, submerging of forested riverine countries wholly destroys the natural wood.

Stairss taken by the authorities:

The national wood policy of India, 1998, is now in force. Its preparation has been seasonably and surely a pronounced betterment over the policy of 1952, which emphasized on increasing the country under forest screen to 33 % or 1/3rd of the state entire geographical country and 60 % in the hills of north-east India.

Forest development bureau ( FDA ) is a cardinal bureau which provides fiscal aid to the province authorities for the planting of trees and preservation of forest country.

The authorities of Assam has of tardily formulated a wood policy, developing a common attack to pull off both environment and biodiversity. The new policy, 2004, which is foremost of its sort, seems to be a comprehensive thoughtful one fuel, because the policy has considered about all the major environment concern like vegetations and zoologies, wildlife, dirt birthrate etc. the policy provides a comprehensive scheme for environmental preservation and improved support system for support for the people populating in the periphery countries of woods and thereby seeks to get the better of the two major environmental problems- debasement of biodiversity and forest screen.

CONSERVATION STRATEGY of FOREST RESOURCES IN NORTH EAST:

Management of Biosphere Reserves, National Parks, Sanctuaries etc. in the part.

Regulation of Sacred Groves.

Introduction of more plans on Afforestation.

Possible Replacement of countries under Switching Cultivation by alternate economic activities.

Ecosystem based forest direction has to be adopted to keep ecological balance.

Reforestation in the deforested countries must be regulated to reconstruct the ecological balance.

Plantation of trees and flora should be made a mandatory characteristic in educational institutes, Youth nines and in communities.

Areas of water-shed should besides be managed through afforestation plans.

Alternate Livelihood must be provided for forest inhabitants.

Over-exploitation, habitat loss and atomization are the three major factors that threaten the biodiversity of this part. Forest is the critical constituents to prolong the life support system on the earth.Forests are playing an of import function in the socio-economic development of a state or part. The function of forest in ecological balance,

Last but non the least, serious attempts will hold to be made to protect and conserve forest both at authorities every bit good as public degree. Due attending should be given to forest direction. Some of the utile stairss for the preservation of wood are as follows:

A proper ratio between forest cutting and plantation of trees should be maintained.

Actual growing of trees is supervised.

Strict prohibition of the film editing of trees for fuel is imposed.

Protection from forest fire.

Development of Natural Park and sanctuaries.

Social forestry is developed.

Forest study, be conducted and categorization be done consequently.

Plantation of trees harmonizing to local ecological status.

Long term maestro program for forest preservation and development is prepared.

Decision:

Environmental stableness, bio-diversity preservation, nutrient security and sustainable development has been widely recognized at many facets of preservation schemes. The cardinal function of the wood has been recognized in their ecological, cultural, commercial and aesthetic facets, yet rapid shrinking of wood screen is endangering to lean the ecological balance in the North Eastern Region. A ample disappearing of wood screen is doing serious harm to forest ecosystem of the part. The fast dwindling of wood screen is attributed to rampant invasion and unbridled home ground enlargement in the wood land. Invasion is more aggressive in forest countries located along the inter-state boundary with Nagaland, Arunachal Pradesh, Assam and Meghalaya. For the Northeast the CDM support potency can be maximized if the definition allows for high crown denseness and tallness. Appropriate countries can be readily identified through comparative appraisals of forest screen alterations utilizing the widely available aerial maps of the part. However, in the absence of an in agreement definition it is impossible to quantify the fiscal chances that could emerge from the CDM. Further appraisals must expect authorities determinations

Man has ever had an built-in association with nature, and thereby with wood. He has bit by bit changed the facet of natural ecosystem into semisynthetic ecosystem. Thus it can be said that adult male has the power excessively to command the farther debasement of our natural environment if he desires to make the needed action and it would be possible merely through the engagement of adult male in regard of the saving and preservation of assorted natural resources where, forest resource is one of the critical 1. Hence it is deserving adverting that preservation of forest resources in North East India is demand of the hr.