Effects Of The Soft Drink Tax Economics Essay

Presents, fleshiness has become a serious epidemic disease worldwide. The increasing prevalence of fleshiness is a large job which threats the public wellness awfully. Australia is faced with terrible corpulent job. “ The Medical Journal of Australia found that fleshiness in Australia more that doubled in the two decennaries predating 2003, and the unprecedented rise in fleshiness has been compared to the same wellness crisis in America “ ( Dunn, A. , 2003 ) . The lifting prevalence can do important bad effects on the society. Obesity is associated with wellness jobs. “ An corpulent individual has a higher hazard of mortality from cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, degenerative arthritis, and some specific signifiers of malignant neoplastic disease. As a individual ‘s weight additions, their hazard of developing more than one of these medical conditions besides increases ” ( Medibank Health Solutions, 2010 ) . Apart from the physical effects, fleshiness besides has bad effects on people ‘s psychological effects. Besides, it can give rise to great economic and societal costs. Thus fleshiness is a pressing concern in Australia. Taking soft drinks is an of import factor which causes fleshiness. This paper discusses the imposure on carbonated soft drinks to take down soft drink ingestion. Since carbonated soft drink ingestion is reduced, it has a good influence on fleshiness bar.

Evidence Statement: There is strong grounds that a revenue enhancement on carbonated soft drinks reduces carbonated soft drink ingestion.

Statement Analysis

The ingestion of carbonated soft drinks is considered to be a conducive factor to burden addition and fleshiness. “ One survey followed 548 schoolchildren over 19 months and found that alterations in soft drink were associated with alterations in organic structure mass index ( BMI ) . Each soft drink that a kid added to his or her day-to-day ingestion was accompanied by an addition in BMI of 0.24 kg/m2 ” ( Ludwig, Peterson and Gortmaker, 2001 ) . Therefore, the ingestion of carbonated soft drinks demands to be reduced. Many experts advocate revenue enhancement on soft drinks. The purpose of enforcing revenue enhancement on carbonated soft drinks is to control unhealthy diet and prevent fleshiness. Since a revenue enhancement is imposed on the carbonated soft drinks, the monetary values of the carbonated soft drinks addition. A figure of surveies have found that sodium carbonate ingestion is price-sensitive ( Andreyeva, Long and Brownell, 2010 ) . As the monetary values of soft drinks addition, the consumer buys less carbonated soft drinks or the hapless even stops to purchase.


Monetary value alterations can act upon the purchases and ingestion of carbonated soft drinks. Based on the best estimations to day of the month of the reactivity of demand for soft drinks to alterations in monetary value ( Andreyeva, Long and Brownell, 2010 ) , a revenue enhancement of 1 cent per ounce of drink would increase the cost of a 20-oz soft drink by 15 to 20 % . The influence on ingestion can be estimated by research on monetary value snap. The monetary value snap for all soft drinks is in the scope of -0.8 to -1.0 ( Andreyeva, Long and Brownell, 2010 ) . ( Elasticity of -0.8 suggests that for every 10 % addition in monetary value, there would be a lessening in ingestion of 8 % ) . With the usage of a conservative estimation that consumers would replace Calories in other signifiers for 25 % of the decreased Calorie ingestion, an excise revenue enhancement of 1 cent per ounce would take to a minimal decrease of 10 % in calorie ingestion from sweetened drinks, or 20 kcal per individual per twenty-four hours, a decrease that is sufficient for weight loss and decrease in hazard ( Brownell et al. , 2009 ) . The effects could be higher user of soft drinks ( Gustavsen and Rickertsen, 2005 ) . Price intercession is an effectual manner to take down carbonated soft drinks ingestion.

Many research workers have linked monetary values to soft drink ingestion. Research has shown that nutrient ingestion is sensitive to monetary value alterations. Based on November 2008 monetary value addition and volume gross revenues information on Coca Cola and Pepsi gross revenues in the U.S. demand for sodium carbonate is “ elastic ” ( -1.15 ) significance that a 10 % revenue enhancement would cut down ingestion by 11.5 % ( Beverage Digest, 2008 ) . If the monetary values of carbonated soft drinks are raised, the consumers will cut down their demand on soft drinks and bend to other picks. It can advance the purchases of healthy drinks ( Rudd study, 2009 ) . If a revenue enhancement is imposed on carbonated soft drinks, the monetary values of the drinks will increase necessarily. Consequently, the ingestion is discouraged.

Besides the above grounds, a survey, published in the American Journal of Public Health, besides prove that revenue enhancement can take down carbonated soft drinks ingestion. The survey was carried out at Harvard ‘s Brigham and Women ‘s Hospital in Boston. The research workers raised the monetary value of sugary soft drinks in the university canteen by 35 per centum for a four hebdomad period. Regular soft drinks ingestion declined by 26 per centum during the monetary value addition stage ( Food Product Design, 2010 ) . While gross revenues of regular soft drinks fell, gross revenues of diet soft drinks and java increased by 20 per centum ( Thomas, 2010 ) . This survey shows that the monetary value addition of sugary soft drinks reduces the ingestion of sugary drinks and may promote many people to take fitter drinks ( Thomas ) . The research workers besides held an educational run enduring four hebdomads to recommend the pupils to diminish soft drinks ingestion. However, this attack did non work. During this period, the soft drinks ingestion alterations little ( Thomas ) . The instruction had small influence on gross revenues.

The survey on kids besides supports the theory. Small sales-tax additions on soft drinks may cut down ingestion and kerb fleshiness for some at-risk kids ( Pediatric Super Site, 2010 ) . Each 1 per centum revenue enhancement difference between soft drinks and other nutrients was associated with a 0.222 lessening in BMI among those at hazard for going corpulence ( Pi?¤0.5 ) . Children of low-income families ( i?¤ $ 25,000 ) and those who watched more than nine hours of Television per hebdomad consumed fewer sodium carbonates overall ( 0.029 ) and in school ( 0.142 ) per hebdomad for each 1 % of revenue enhancement ( Pi?¤0.5 ) ( Pediatric Super Site ) . A revenue enhancement on carbonated soft drinks can cut down ingestion for some particular groups and kerb weight addition for some at-risk kids.

Furthermore, the revenue enhancement of baccy and intoxicant demonstrates a good illustration for the revenue enhancement of carbonated soft drinks. The revenue enhancement of baccy and intoxicant demonstrates that it is possible to act upon consumer behaviour and wellness results by the revenue enhancement system. It is suggested that coffin nail revenue enhancements is an effectual manner to forestall the young person and grownup from smoke and better public wellness ( Fletcher, Frisvold and Tefft, 2009 ) . Economic surveies conclude that every 10 % addition in the existent monetary value of coffin nails reduces ingestion by 3 to 5 % overall, 3.5 % among immature grownup tobacco users and 6 to 7 % among kids ( Rudd study ) . As a affair of fact, grownups, particularly immature grownups are sensitive to the monetary value of intoxicant and that increases in intoxicant revenue enhancements would cut down mortality, hurts and offense ( Fletcher, Frisvold and Tefft, ) . The belongingss of carbonated soft drinks are like the belongingss of baccy and intoxicant. Like baccy and intoxicant, carbonated soft drinks are non necessities for life and it can do societal jobs. Therefore, carbonated soft drinks ingestion can besides be reduced by a revenue enhancement.


All the groundss listed above are imaginable to back up the theory that a revenue enhancement on carbonated soft drinks reduces carbonated soft drink ingestion. These groundss are persuasive but they are non perfect. It has disadvantages and defects. The first grounds is the most convincing grounds. However there are non plenty practical instances to turn out the theory. The 2nd survey is carried out in a little country during a short clip. A general decision can non be made from this grounds. The 3rd 1 has the same advantage as the 2nd grounds. The 4th one is least convincing.

Although the groundss for enforcing revenue enhancement on carbonated soft drinks have defects, it is converting adequate to do a decision that a revenue enhancement should be added to carbonate soft drinks to cut down carbonated soft drinks ingestion and prevent fleshiness.

Evidence interlingual rendition: A gross revenues revenue enhancement of 5 % should be added to carbonate soft drinks in Australia.

Statement analysis

Carbonated soft drinks do non incorporate any nutrition. It can do fleshiness and other diseases. Obesity is a serious job in Australia. It non merely threats public wellness but besides generates immense economic costs. The entire costs of fleshiness to the Australian economic system are 37.7 billion dollars. The direct costs are 1.3billion dollars. The indirect costs are 6.4 one million millions dollars. And the disease costs are 30 billion dollars, which is a large proportion in the entire costs ( Medibank Health Solutions ) . Thus fleshiness intercession should be made desperately. The groundss show that enforcing revenue enhancement on carbonated soft drink can cut down ingestion. If the carbonated soft drinks ingestion is reduced, fleshiness can be prevented to some grade. The revenue enhancement step encourages the populace to hold healthier diet and life manners.

Besides, the revenue enhancement can bring forth enormous grosss for authorities. For illustration, in USA, Arkansas revenue enhancements 0.21 dollar per gallon of liquid soft drink and 2 dollars per gallon of soft drink sirups, bring forthing about 40.4 million dollars in one-year income. California has a 7.25 % gross revenues revenue enhancement on soft drinks that produces an estimated 218 million dollars in one-year income for the province ( Brownson and Shiriki Kumanyika, P161 ) . These grosss can be used to bring around and forestall fleshiness and wage for the comparative medical disbursals. Enforcing revenue enhancement can forestall fleshiness and cut down the disbursals on fleshiness interim it will bring forth more money for fleshiness intervention and bar. The revenue enhancement can besides promote the soft drink company to develop healthier drink. For illustration the company can utilize xylitol which is nonsweet to replace sugar.

Enforcing revenue enhancement on carbonated soft drinks is necessary. However, the impersonation on revenue enhancement is a complicated and controversial job. There are many statements on this issue. Many people are opposed to this proposal. There are side effects on this issue. Besides, how much revenue enhancement should be added and which sort of revenue enhancement should be imposed can non be decided easy.

Peoples doubt that whether soft drink revenue enhancement is an effectual method to cut down ingestion. The survey on kids mentioned in the 3rd grounds shows that little soft drink revenue enhancement has small influence on ingestion. For each 1 % addition in soft-drink revenue enhancement, the decrease in entire soft drinks per hebdomad was 0.004 and the decrease in soft drinks purchased at schools per hebdomad was 0.010. overall BMI was decreased by 0.033 ( Pi?¤0.5 ) ( Pediatric Super Site ) . Although soft drink revenue enhancements have existed since at least 1920 ( New York Times, 1920 ) and until late these revenue enhancements have been used chiefly to bring forth gross ( Caraher and Cowburn, 2005 ) .

The monetary value addition of carbonated soft drink may actuate consumers to purchase the replacements, such as athleticss drink and other drinks with high caloric. What ‘s worse, this attack may promote consumers to purchase larger containers because the cost per ounce is lower, so the revenue enhancement per ounce would be lower every bit good ( Rudd Report ) . Then, the revenue enhancement step may hold an inauspicious consequence. Meanwhile, this issue besides involves the jobs of societal equity and single liberty ( Basham and Luik, 2010 ) .


Based the above groundss and analysis, a revenue enhancement should be levied on carbonated soft drinks to forestall fleshiness in Australia. However, in order to do the fleshiness intercession effectual, little revenue enhancement is inefficient. A sale revenue enhancement of 5 % does non hold adequate consequence on the autumn of the carbonated soft drinks ingestion. The monetary value addition of carbonated soft drink may excite the consumers to purchase other drinks with high caloric or larger containers. To work out this job, excise revenue enhancement has more advantages that sale revenue enhancement.