Looking At Sterotypical Traits In Siddhartha And Oedipus English Literature Essay

For centuries, work forces have been acknowledged as the most superior members in the society. They have been called the ‘decision shapers ‘ or ‘leaders ‘ for their physical art and strength. They have dominated the adult females for ages ; nevertheless, all work forces are non the same. Their attitudes vary and this has been seen really normally. Work forces do non simply give adversities but they besides give many beautiful minutes to the people around them. They work, suffer, enjoy and make everything possible to go pillars strong plenty to back up everyone. The manner they have been portrayed in literature differs from author to author.

Siddhartha, a German book translated into English, is the narrative of a immature adult male named Siddhartha, who was in hunt of self realisation. “ Siddhartha had begun to experience the seeds of discontent within him. ”[ 1 ]Like all work forces who are by and large interested in deriving cognition, Siddhartha was non satisfied with the cognition that he had gained from his male parent and other learned work forces and so he decided to go forth his small town. He was a adult male who wanted to confront world.

On being disillusioned by the life of repentance among the Samanas, Siddhartha decided to ship on a life free from speculation and the religious pursuits that he had been prosecuting. A friendly ferryman helped him traverse the river to travel to the metropolis. In the metropolis he found a beautiful concubine named Kamala. Siddhartha thought that Kamala was the 1 who could take him into the universe of love, but Kamala would non unless he proved that he could suit into the material universe. Siddhartha procured a occupation with a merchandiser named Kamaswami and started to get the hang the accomplishments of a merchandiser and became successful. Here Siddhartha took up the challenge to turn out that he could suit into the material universe, which shows the common character trait of a adult male who wants to turn out his worth. He easy came to cognize that the material universe would non take him to the route of enlightenment which he had been seeking for and so he decided to go forth behind everything and travel in hunt of enlightenment and wished to go somebody new in his ain manner.

On his manner to follow a new way he met the ferryman whom he had met old ages ago and started life and working with him. Vasudeva the ferryman led him along his way, that of deriving interior peace listening to the river. One twenty-four hours Kamala approached the ferry with her boy to see Gautama Buddha who was deceasing. When she died of a serpent bite, Siddhartha had a disclosure, that is, he said, “ Merely as the H2O of the river flows into the ocean and is returned by a rain, all signifiers of life are interconnected in a rhythm without a beginning or terminal. ”[ 2 ]Siddhartha had now learned the secret of the river. Siddhartha started listening to the river and experienced the religious enlightenment which he had non known and had been in hunt of. Vasudeva retired to the wood. One twenty-four hours Govinda met Siddhartha and Govinda asked Siddhartha to learn him what he knew and Siddhartha asked him to snog his brow from which the vision of integrity that Siddhartha had experienced was communicated immediately to Govinda. Finally, therefore, like a typical adult male, by dint of his doggedness, Siddhartha gained what he wanted.

Oedipus Tyrannus by Sophocles is about a prognostication by Apollo which stated that King Laius would give birth to a kid ( boy ) who would kill his ain male parent and get married his ain female parent. King Laius responded to it by acquiring the mortise joint of his boy pierced and abandoning him. The adult male who took the kid to abandon him felt commiseration for the kid and gave it to a shepherd. The shepherd took the kid to the King of Corinth, that is, King Polybus who did non hold a kid. He adopted the kid as he did non hold any. The kid grew up and unluckily came to cognize about the prognostication, from a rummy. He left Corinth and went to Delphi to happen the truth about the prognostication. On his manner to Delphi, he met King Laius and his soldiers and had a battle with them where he killed King Laius and his soldiers except a retainer who escaped. He reached Thebes and freed the people from the Sphinx and married his female parent Jocasta. The prognostication by Apollo comes true. A courier came to Thebes with good and bad intelligence. He found Oedipus and gave him the good intelligence that Oedipus had become the male monarch and the bad intelligence was that his male parent Polybus had died. The courier told Oedipus that Polybus was non his existent male parent. Oedipus felt funny to cognize who his existent male parent was and called for the adult male who escaped the violent death. When the shepherd and the retainer were called, the truth that Oedipus had killed his ain male parent was revealed. Oedipus accepted it and took the ostracism and the metropolis was freed from the pestilence.

In Oedipus Tyrannus we see that the male supporter, Oedipus was really obstinate but did non hold control over his emotions. His uncontrolled emotions besides led him to everlasting wretchedness and he blinded himself. His wonder to cognize the truth sing Laius ‘s decease merely led him to penalize himself. His obstinacy to cognize the truth carries the secret plan of the drama frontward making a batch of suspense throughout, along with many elements of boding. In Oedipus Tyrannus the male supporter unlike Siddhartha did non utilize his darling 1s to achieve his end. He merely used people placed under him to acquire the truth. As Oedipus was the male monarch he had control over everyone and ordered people to acquire his occupation done and cipher could object to his orders. It was really dry because he did non hold control over himself.

In Siddhartha, the supporter is really focused on his end to seek self-fulfillment, and his end is so powerful that it does non convey in any emotions. When he leaves his household and friend while traveling towards his end we see the contrastive nature of both the supporters: while Siddhartha is stubborn but without emotions, Oedipus who is besides determined to happen the truth is really emotional.

In Siddhartha, the supporter acts stubborn while seeking permission from his male parent to seek self-fulfillment and while go forthing the Samanas. In Siddhartha, the protagonist uses people as stairss towards redemption. He first uses Kamala and additions knowledge sing love. Siddhartha meets Kamaswami from whom he gets to cognize what takes topographic point in existent life, that is, the material universe. The chief unconditioned support which Siddhartha gets is from Govinda where Govinda becomes his first follower and this is when Siddhartha grows confident that he can accomplish his end. In the first portion, Siddhartha has good control over Kamala and Kamaswami, but in the 2nd portion, we can detect that in malice of suppressing everything he can non derive control over his ain kid which is once more similar to Oedipus ‘ quandary.

Despite Oedipus and Siddhartha being male supporters they have different character traits every bit good. Oedipus is a adult male of emotions and is really close to and concerned about his household. This can be seen when he tells Creon to take care his girls when he is banished from the state. Siddhartha, on the other manus had no nexus with his household which is observed in the fact that he left them when he went in hunt of enlightenment. Oedipus is a adult male of duty as he had to take attention of the province every bit good as his household whereas Siddhartha did non hold any duty until he had to take attention of his boy after Kamala ‘s decease. Siddhartha is focused on a end, that is, to acquire enlightenment unlike Oedipus whose end is to cognize the truth about Laius ‘s decease. Both the supporters are logical minds, for illustration, Siddhartha left the Samanas concluding that he could non derive enlightenment through repentance when the oldest Samana had non gained it. Oedipus excessively drew decisions by his mind ; for case, when his married woman Jocasta told him about the topographic point where King Laius was murdered, he began to ask about the violent death and unluckily trapped himself.

Finally, both these supporters, goaded by their typical male features, found what they sought, though ironically, one experienced peace and repose by this chase while the other suffered deathless wretchedness in its aftermath. More research needs to be undertaken to measure what it was that brought about these differences in the results.