Love and Seduction

Love and Seduction

When comparing Andrew Marvell ‘s “To His Coy Mistress” and Robert Browning ‘s “My Last Duchess” these verse forms are on different terminals of the spectrum. The talkers in both verse forms are speaking about love and seduction, but even though they are about two different ways of loving they are one in the same. Love is the strongest subject of these verse forms. In Marvell and Browning ‘s poems the talkers so love in such alone ways.

In Andrew Marvell ‘s, “To Coy His Mistress” , the talker of the verse form is infatuated with a adult female who wo n’t give him the clip of twenty-four hours. The talker chases the adult female and he proposes that clip is winging by and they should catch it and run every bit fast as they can. “Had we but universe plenty and clip, This demureness, lady, were no offense. ( 1-2 )

“There is general understanding that Andrew Marvell ‘s “ To his Coy Mistress ” is a carpe diem, invitation-to-love, seduction verse form couched in a syllogistic, or seemingly- syllogistic, statement: if we lived everlastingly, your virginity would be appropriate ; but we do non populate everlastingly, and therefore we should prosecute in sexual activity.” ( Halli Jr. )

The Speaker in Browning ‘s “My Last Duchess” was an chesty adult male. His married woman was his ownership and nil should convey her felicity besides him. When the Duke who was the talker in the verse form decided that his married woman was basking life he bragged to a retainer that he had her killed.” Much the same smiling? This grew ; I gave bids ; Then all smilings stopped together. There she stands as if alive.” ( 45-47 ) Before he had her killed he had her airs for a picture. So now the Duchess is on his wall. “Too easy impressed ; she like whate’er She looked on, and her expressions went everywhere.” ( 22-23 )

In contrast to Browning ‘s “My Last Duchess” , the talker negotiations about the Duke as a existent grandiloquent buttocks. The Duke struts around with a fancy rubric but no existent money or category to endorse it up. The Duke negotiations of his married woman as a trophy and fundamentally that is what her portrayal is on his wall a trophy. He talks about his married woman as a coquette or traitorous married woman, but she received guiltless joy from life ‘s many gifts. The Duke ‘s self-importance gets the best of him.

“As he believes is merely his right, the Duke efforts to get another Duchess who will react entirely to him, and to that terminal he tells his last duchess ‘s narrative. In so make he uncover a colossal self-importance. But through his very accomplishment in address he betrays that self-importance for his subtle and unconscious slander of his last victim unmaskings at underside an natural self- apologist, or at least a adult male insecure behind a autocrats swagman. All in all the Duke ‘s history of the presence of the topographic point of joy in the portrayal does non reprobate his Duchess to a moral place be givening to pardon his actions toward her, but alternatively reinforces the verse form ‘s greatest accomplishment: the decline of an self-importance sustained by usage of linguistic communication both elusive and audacious.” ( Miller 33 )

In “To His Coy Mistress” , the talker illustrates a adult male trailing a adult female. In “The Last Duchess” , the talker shows that the Duke does hold everlasting control over the Duchess. He had her killed and now she is mounted on the wall for everyone to see.

In both verse forms love connects the talker ‘s to the verse forms. In Browning ‘s verse form, the talker presents love in a psychotic manner. He obliviously loves himself and handle his adult females as belongings, and when the belongings does n’t happen happiness with him, he kills her.

The love illustrated in “To Coy His Mistress” was presented as a immature adult male with demands to be filled and he was seeking really hard to tribunal this adult female. “ An hundred old ages should travel to praise Thine eyes, and on thy brow regard, two hundred to adore each chest, but 30 1000 to the rest.” ( 13-16 ) The talker in this verse form becomes self-asserting and slightly aggressive with seeking to carry through these demands. The talker gets shot down many times by this adult female and he becomes agitated. “Then worms shall seek That longed preserved virginity” ( 27-28 )

The feeling used by both writers is passion. The talker in the verse form “My Last Duchess” shows that the Duke was passionate about his dead married woman by the manner he gazed at her portrayal upon the wall. The talker in the verse form “To Coy His Mistress” showed his passion for reproduction, which would besides be considered lust.

In decision, passion and lust drove both writers to compose about the same topic but in different context. The talker in Browning ‘s verse form related love to a material ownership, and the idea of if I ca n’t hold you no 1 else will. The talker in Marvell ‘s poem radius like he was in “puppy love” until he got tired of the pursuit. Both writers showed love in really different visible radiations.

Plants Cited

Browning, Robert. “My Last Duchess.” 1842. Introduction to Liturature Part 2 Poetry. Comp. X J Kennedy and Dana Gioia. Tenth erectile dysfunction. Vol. 2. N.p. : n.p. , n.d. 668. Print. Introduction to Poetry.

Halli, Robert W, Jr. “The Persuasion of the Coy Mistress.” Rev. of To His Coy Mistress. Philological Quarterly 80.1: 57-70. Proquest. Web. 16 Nov. 2009. & lt ; hypertext transfer protocol: //proquest.umi.com & gt ; .

Marvell, Andrew. “To His Coy Mistress.” Introduction to Literature Part 2 Poetry. Comp. Dana Gioia and X J Kennedy. Tenth erectile dysfunction. Vol. 2. N.p. , 1681. 1139. Print. Poetry 2.

Miller, Michael G. “Browning ‘s My Last Duchess.” Rev. of My Last Duchess. Explicator 47.4: 32. SIRS Renaissance. Web. 16 Nov. 2009.