The Crying of Lot 49 by Thomas Pynchon is a great narrative of enigma of sarcasm that takes topographic point between existent life and the chief fictional character Oedipa Maas. Oedipa starts off as a homemaker and ends up being consumed by society. Like a hero she has the finding, will power and the capacity to execute the undertaking given to her, but goes excessively far in her hunt going an anti-hero in herself.
Oedipa efforts at happening significance in her life. She is depicted as a white suburban homemaker who on a regular basis tends her garden, attends Tupperware parties, and prepares dinner for her hubby. Although her life seems “ typical ” of suburban homemakers, Oedipa experiences frequent psychotic episodes and hallucinations. In the first chapter we learn that Oedipa had visions of herself as Rapunzel trapped, which can symbol her sense of being lost and necessitating something more in life than what she has. Oedipa is mesmerized with the Trystero on the bathroom door, get downing her on journey of something more that she may be desiring. Having this want discovery significance in this, Oedipa, starts and pursues on every hint she can acquire. She takes notice of the smallest inside informations and shops them off in her head, hanging onto them and perfectly determined to do something out of them, or happen a concealed significance that was left behind for her. For illustration, Oedipa becomes obsessed in the drama “ The Courier ‘s Calamity ” acquiring her custodies on the book that the book was taken from and so traveling even farther back to its original roots before recognizing that none of them are the same. Oedipa is stuck on the word Trystero, and even the manager Driblette tells her “ You can set together hints, develop a thesis, or several about why characters reacted to the trystero possibility the manner they did, why the bravos came on, why the black costumes. You could blow your life that manner and ne’er touch the truth. ” Is this heroic to happen an reply or merely crazy? Oedipa is coming out of her shell as a homemaker, looking for replies and going assurance that she is capable of making more than remaining at place.
It is harder for Oedipa to organize connexions or basic truth to events blossoming around her, because all the characters around her provender into paranoia and defeat. Her hubby, Mucho Maas is supposed stick together through midst and thin goes brainsick on LSD, and ends up estranging Oedipa, Dr. Hilarius who loses it wholly shoots at people, the set called The Paranoids, and even Mike Fallopian. All of these characters around Oedipa battle with their ain analysis of life events and are non positive function theoretical accounts for Oedipa. Oedipa ‘s paranoia begins to turn as she states, “ Each hint that comes is supposed to hold its ain lucidity, its all right opportunities for permanency. ” It is about as Oedipa is self-justifying the way she has taken, doing certain she is in world. At first it may hold been heroic that Oedipa was making something good determination positive replies for Pierce, but that thought has now disappeared. In the terminal, Oedipa finds herself entirely and alienated from society, holding lost touch with the homemaker life she used to populate before she began her effort to bring out the enigma of the Trystero.
There are a few illustrations of sarcasm which Pynchon uses in this book. The first one the reader should pick up on is the name Oedipa which is really similar to Oedipus. However Oedipus can see he is unsighted to the events taking topographic point around him. This can be compared to Oedipa that she is blinded by Trystero and is so consumed that she is losing her individuality and consciousness of the universe around her. Another illustration of sarcasm is how the narrative is, and there is ne’er an reply. Pynchon is about comparing the reader to Oedipa because we are seeking to set the hints together throughout the book every bit good. It is a enigma book, and there are so many high spots, the reader admirations when it is all traveling to come together. In the terminal, it does n’t and the reader and Oedipa are both baffled. He makes merriment of everyone who tries to happen significance from the fragments of life that we all perceive in our ain manner. Pynchon knew that the reader would be seeking to do intending out of something that he states has no significance. W.A.S.T.E seemed like he was doing merriment of how people waste their clip in calculating out life events and intent in life. Oedipas long journey to seek and calculate out the hints wasted her clip, all for what? She wasted more off than she did addition, and came out more baffled and frustrated with life.
Peoples do seek to do sense of universe significance and there aim in life, although I do non believe it is normally taken every bit far as Oedipa took it. Oedipa wanted Pierce to salvage her from her tower like Rapunzel, and he did. It seemed like he knew that he still had control over her emotional province, and even though it was non positive, Oedipa still was freed from this experience. Continuing until the terminal, Oedipa was determined to calculate out the enigma of the Trystero and that is a quality of a hero. Although finding and seeking to devour information can be positive when calculating out hints, you can non allow it take over. In the terminal, there was no intent and Oedipa was left with nil. Not everything in life will do sense and you can either accept it and travel on, or travel brainsick seeking to calculate it out. Hopefully if you try to calculate it out, you will non stop up blowing your clip.