Studying The Importance Of Marine Pollution Control Environmental Sciences Essay

By far the greatest beginnings of Marine pollution are those that are land-based. For both pollution extenuation intents and the preservation of marine biodiversity it is critical that international attempts to turn to land based beginnings of Marine pollution are accelerated. In reply to this pressing demand and as a consequence of Agenda 21, the Global Program of Action for the Protection of the Marine Environment from Land-Based Activities ( GPA ) was adopted by over 100 authoritiess, including Australia, in Washington D.C. on 3 November 1995.

The GPA is a non-legally binding instrument, aimed at forestalling the debasement of the marine environment from land-based activities by easing the realization of the responsibility of States to continue and protect the marine environment. The beginnings of Marine pollution it targets include sewerage, relentless organic pollutants, radiation, metals, oils, foods, sediment mobilization, litter and habitat devastation. It proposes action at chiefly the national and regional degrees with some coordination undertakings at the planetary degree. The GPA is designed to be a beginning of practical counsel to States in taking actions within their several policies, precedences and resources.

Australia has been an active participant in meetings to discourse the development, execution and reappraisal of the GPA. The GPA in Australia.

Marine Pollution from Transporting

Examples of Australian enterprises to turn to marine pollution from transporting include:

aˆ?Introduced Marine Plagues Program

aˆ?Marine Waste Reception Facilities Program

Marine Pollution from Sea Dumping

Australia is a signer to the Convention on the Prevention of Marine Pollution from Dumping of Wastes and Other Matter ( London Convention 1972 ) and the 1996 Protocol thereto.

The Department of the Environment and Heritage prepares regular newssheets to supply industry by and large with information about the London Convention and the Protocol, Australia ‘s engagement at London Convention meetings, and inside informations of chances for industry engagement at such meetings.

aˆ?London Convention Newsletter No 1, February 2002

aˆ?London Convention Newsletter No 2, June 2002

aˆ?London Convention Newsletter No 3, December 2002

Australia presently regulates the deliberate burden, dumping and incineration of waste at sea under the Environment Protection ( Sea Dumping ) Act 1981. The Waterss environing Australia ‘s coastline are progressively threatened by pollution from wastes dumped at sea. To cut down this menace, there are Australian Government Torahs that control dumping at sea.

Licenses from The Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Humanistic disciplines are required for all sea dumping operations.

Print Version

The Global Programme of Action for the Protection of the Marine Environment from Land-Based Activities

We are presently working with the UK-based Stakeholder Forum to reexamine and update this site with exciting new add-ons. We ask that you return back frequently to larn more about how you and your community can protect the marine environment.

— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

Welcome to the Official Website of the Global Programme of Action for the Protection of the Marine Environment from Land-based Activities ( GPA-Marine ) . The GPA-Marine is the lone planetary intergovernmental enterprise straight turn toing the nexus between water partings, coastal Waterss and the unfastened ocean.

The GPA-Marine enjoys about cosmopolitan support, with repeated calls by the General Assembly and other many-sided fora to speed up its execution. Increasingly the GPA-Marine is seen as a valuable tool to increase the resiliency of coastal and marine environments to the force per unit areas of clime alteration. The comprehensive, multi-sectoral and flexible attack of the GPA-Marine reflects the desire of Governments to beef up coaction and coordination at national, regional and planetary graduated tables.

— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

David Osborn, Coordinator, GPA-Marine

Waves of Change – Global Lessons to Inspire Local Action

UNEP and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration ( NOAA ) are co-organizers of the Fifth International Marine Debris Conference which will take topographic point March 20-25, 2011, in Honolulu, Hawai’i.

The conference, will convey together international Marine dust research workers, natural resource directors, policy shapers, industry representatives, and the nongovernmental community. This conference will foreground research progresss, allow sharing of schemes and best patterns to measure, cut down, and prevent the impacts of marine dust, and supply an chance for the development of specific bilateral or multi-country schemes.

For more information visit

“ Ill H2O? The cardinal function of effluent direction in sustainable development ” non merely identifies the menaces to human and ecological wellness and the effects of inactivity, but besides presents chances, where appropriate policy and direction responses over the short and longer term can trip employment, support supports, hike public and ecosystem wellness and contribute to more intelligent H2O direction. ”

Did you cognize?

Equally much as 80 % of the pollution burden in coastal Waterss and the deep oceans originates from land-based activities. This includes run-off and effluent from farms, metropoliss and mills, every bit good as the atmospheric deposition of pollutants from power coevals, heavy industry, cars, etc. The pollutants include heavy metals and Persistent Organic Pollutants ( POPs ) , litter, radioactive waste, hydrocarbons and chemicals.

These contaminations, every bit good as alterations to of course occurirng tonss of foods and deposits affect the most productive countries of the Marine environment, including Rhizophora mangles, salt fens, seagrass hayfields, coral reefs, estuaries and near-shore coastal Waterss. Of turning concern is the impact of increasing atmospheric C dioxide concentrations and the attendant acidification of the sea. Intensifying these alterations, the Marine environment is progressively threatened by physical changes to the coastal zone, including the devastation of home grounds critical to keep ecosystem wellness and ecosystem services.

History in a Hurry:

The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea ( UNCLOS ) obliges authoritiess to take steps to forestall, cut down and command pollution of the marine environment from land-based beginnings ( see peculiarly Articles 194 and 207 ) . In 1995, every bit many as 108 authoritiess and the European Commission declared their committedness to protect and continue the marine environment from the inauspicious environmental impacts of land-based activities by following the Global Programme of Action for the Protection of the Marine Environment from Land-based Activities ( GPA ) and the Washington Declaration. UNEP was tasked with the Secretariat map and established the GPA Coordination Office. The first Intergovernmental Review was held in Montreal in 2001 and adopted the Montreal Declaration. The 2nd Intergovernmental Review was held in Beijing in 2006 and adopted the Beijing Declaration.

Introduced Marine plagues

Introduced Marine plagues are species moved to an country outside their natural scope by and large by human activities, and that threaten human wellness, economic values or the environment.

Marine plagues are introduced to Australian Waterss and translocated inside our Waterss by a assortment of vectors, including ballast H2O discharged by commercial transportation, bio-fouling on hulls and inside internal saltwater pipes of commercial and recreational vass, aquaculture operations ( by chance and deliberately ) , aquarium imports, every bit good as marine dust and ocean currents.

Better known introduced Marine species include the Black Striped mussel, the Asian Green mussel and the Northern Pacific seastar. Read more from the CSIRO Centre for Research on Introduced Marine Pests.

The Australian Government response

An Intergovernmental Agreement on a National System for the Prevention and Management of Marine Pest Incursions was signed on 15 April 2005. The Australian Government and Victorian, Tasmanian, the Northern Territory and South Australian authoritiess are signers to this Agreement. New South Wales, Western Australia and Queensland are yet to mark.

Parties to this Agreement agree that the purpose of the National System is to supply effectual and cost efficient processs for the bar, exigency response and on-going direction and control of marine pest incursions while supplying a consistent and cost effectual attack to surround control, conformity and development of statute law.

The Agreement is intended to guarantee that all sectors whose activities may take to the debut and translocation of Marine plagues will pull off the associated Marine plague hazard and that steps implemented under the model of the National System will be consistent with any current or future international understandings associating to introduced Marine species.

aˆ?Intergovernmental Agreement on a National System for the Prevention and Management of Marine Pest Incursions

Australian Government support

Now in its 2nd stage ( 2002-2003 to 2006-2007 ) , the Natural Heritage Trust is funding a scope of undertakings designed to better Introduced Marine Pest ( IMP ) bar, control and direction as portion of the execution of the National System for Preventing and Managing Introduced Marine Pests.

Undertaking support is concentrating on five cardinal elements:

1.Development of models for the constitution of Standards, Best Practice and Codes of Practice to understate the hazards of entry and spread of marine plagues in Australia ;

2.Improvement of the capacity of industries, persons and bureaus with a possible function in marine plagues to take part ;

3.Development of tools and the informations and information substructure to back up the National System ;

4.Economic and Social appraisal and analysis of the impact of possible Marine pest incursions ; and

5.Development and execution of Control Plans for precedence Marine plagues in Australia.

Some of the undertakings funded to day of the month include:

aˆ?Antifouling public presentation criterions for the Maritime industry: Development of a model for appraisal, blessing and relevancy of effectual merchandises

Biofouling of vass, marine equipment, and constructions is recognised as an of import vector for introduced Marine plagues. This study develops antifouling public presentation criterions and proposes a four constituent model for guaranting that vass traveling between coastal H2O zones have applied and maintained effectual antifouling bar systems on their submerged hulls.

aˆ?Feasibility survey for familial control of Caulerpa in SA and NSW

Caulerpa taxifolia is an invasive Marine alga that signifiers extended hayfields, ruling shallow coastal home grounds, displacing native species and doing dramatic diminutions in local biodiversity. This undertaking was a pilot survey to measure the feasibleness of utilizing familial techniques to develop and present a species-specific, little molecule toxin into invasive Caulerpa taxifolia settlements. The feasibly of this attack, every bit good as the clip and resources required to do it operational in the field have been determined

aˆ?Genetic Markers for Determining New Zealand Screwshell Distribution

The New Zealand Screwshell has adapted good to Australian coastal conditions. This species forms heavy populations that have possible to out-compete native species, every bit good as alter deposit construction. The purpose of this undertaking was to develop familial tools to place NZ Screwshell larvae in plankton and benthal samples. This engineering is assisting to supply information about the life history of this species and how it might be transported around Australia ‘s coastline.

aˆ?Empirical Validation – Phase I: Small Vessel Translocation of Key Threatening Species – Asterias amurensis

This undertaking quantifies the coastal translocation of the Northern Pacific seastar, Asterias amurensis, by angling and recreational vass, every bit good as by aquaculture equipment from their chief population centres in the sou’-east of Australia to other presently clean vicinities. This information is designed to help in future control and direction schemes for this plague species.

aˆ?Empirical Validation – Phase Two: Small Vessel Translocation of Key Threatening Species – Asterias amurensis and Undaria pinnatifida

As portion of this undertaking a cistron investigation for Undaria pinnatifida is being developed that can be applied to plankton and hull fouling samples to find presence or absence. Although this phase of the undertaking basically focuses on Undaria pinnatifida, the work undertaken on Asterias amurensis in Stage I is being continued. This information will be used to quantify the translocation potency of assorted internal and external infinites and surfaces on fishing vass, recreational vass and aquaculture equipment. This information will so be used to inform an Infection Modes and Effects Analysis which can so be applied to the development of bio-invasion and hazard appraisal schemes.

Evaluation of National Control Plan Management Options for the Northern Pacific Seastar ( PDF – 8.52 MB )

This undertaking aims to develop a package theoretical account that can be used to find optimum control and direction schemes for this introduced species. The undertaking is expected to present a study detailing estimated costs and benefits of direction and control options for the NPS.

aˆ?National Priority Pests – Part II: Ranking of Australian Marine Plagues

The primary aim of this undertaking was to supply a list of marine species in Australia, other than native species, whose members do or may endanger biodiversity within Australian Waterss. The undertaking study besides includes those species that are deemed likely to endanger biodiversity in the hereafter. A precedence list will so be generated of species that may go the topic of national control programs.

aˆ?Research activities under the National System – Bureau of Rural Sciences

There are two activities within this undertaking. The first consists of sketching issues about the usage of polymerase concatenation reaction ( PCR ) cistron investigations in ballast H2O sampling and port monitoring, including jobs caused by false positive and false negative consequences and the bounds for sensing. The 2nd involves making a package theoretical account that will enable the appraisal of costs to the transportation industry of alternate sets of demands for interchanging ships ‘ ballast H2O on paths between Australian ports.

aˆ?Port Survey Data Integration into Australian Museums

Invertebrate samples gathered during port studies will be assessed and distributed to State museums for integrating into their established aggregation and will clearly place that the specimens were collected during a port study. This information will be uploaded onto OZCAM ( Online Zoological Collections of Australian Museums ) which is a dynamic database developed by Australian museums. Incorporation of the port study samples into Australian museums will guarantee that their long-run attention is guaranteed and that they are accessible for ongoing systematic work via a individual online biodiversity database for national faunal aggregations. The OZCAM database can be accessed at hypertext transfer protocol: //

aˆ?Development of cistron investigations for introduced Marine plague species

The intent of this undertaking is to develop specific DNA primers and real-time polymerase concatenation reaction format ( PCR format ) cistron investigations for the species Musculista senhousia, Corbula gibba and Sabella spallanzanii that are capable of observing larvae in ballast H2O.

aˆ?Studies of the impact and dispersion of the introduced New Zealand Screwshell ( Maoricolpus Roseus ) to ease the development of a direction scheme

Aims of this undertaking include placing features of preferable home ground of M. roseus in inshore environments of the D’Entrecasteaux Channel ; characterizing feeding schemes of M. roseus and associating eating behaviors to habitat and motion ; quantifying the impact of accretions of unrecorded M. roseus and empty M. roseus shells occupied by anchorite pediculosis pubiss ( Paguristes tuberculatus ) on the community construction of soft deposit environments ; quantifying the consequence of screwshell collections on the population kineticss of the commercial crenation ; and finding the timing of reproduction forms of larval development and placing morphogenic cues that trigger colony and metabolism.

aˆ?Development of real-time polymerase concatenation reaction sensing methods for toxic Alexandrium dinoflagellate species

This undertaking will develop familial methods for observing the presence of toxic Alexandrium dinoflagellate species in ballast H2O and the marine environment. Toxic dinoflagellate species can do terrible human wellness jobs through paralytic shellfish toxic condition and lead to the closing of aquaculture endeavors and recreational harvest home of shellfish.

First stage of Natural Heritage Trust undertakings:

aˆ?Controlling the Northern Pacific Seastar ( Asterias amurensis ) in Australia

aˆ?Eradicating and forestalling the spread of the invasive alga Caulerpa taxifolia in NSW

aˆ?Minimising Impacts of the North Pacific Seastar in Australia

aˆ?The Australian pilot undertaking for the intervention of ships ‘ ballast H2O – 2004

London Convention

Australia is one of 78 Contracting Parties to the Convention on the Prevention of Marine Pollution by Dumping of Wastes and Other Matter, 1972 ( the London Convention ) , and has been since 1985, when it officially acceded to that pact.

Australia ‘s accession to the London Convention occurred after beginning of the Environment Protection ( Sea Dumping ) Act 1981 ( the Sea Dumping Act ) , the Commonwealth legislative model which, as originally enacted, implemented the London Convention.

The London Convention is aimed at advancing the effectual control of pollution of the Marine environment, by modulating the dumping of wastes and other matter1 that is apt to:

aˆ?create jeopardies to human wellness ;

aˆ?harm life resources ;

aˆ?damage comfortss ; or

aˆ?interfere with other legitimate utilizations of the sea.

It embodies a model for modulating dumping into the sea from vass, aircraft and platforms, based on a list of substances for which dumping is prohibited and list of substances necessitating particular attention, and the incineration at sea based on incineration guidelines.

The London Convention does non use, nevertheless, in relation to:

aˆ?vessels and aircraft entitled to sovereign unsusceptibility under international jurisprudence ( for illustration, vass and aircraft of the Australian Defence Force2 or of the defense mechanism force of a foreign province ) ;

aˆ?the disposal of wastes or other affair derived from, or incidental to, the normal operations of a vas, aircraft or platform ( for illustration, sewerage and nutrient wastes generated on a vas at sea ) ; or

aˆ?the disposal of wastes or other affair straight originating from, or related to, the geographic expedition, development and associated offshore processing of seabed mineral resources ( for illustration, wastes generated by the seaward oil and gas industry ) .

In 1993, Contracting Parties adopted amendments to the London Convention to phase out the dumping of industrial waste by 1 January 1996, prohibit incineration at sea of industrial waste and sewerage sludge, and prohibit dumping of radioactive waste.

Each of these amendments were later adopted by Australia, with the exclusion of the phasing out of the dumping of industrial waste, which Australia did n’t accomplish until late 19973.

The Protocol to the London Convention

In 1996, Contracting Parties to the London Convention, including Australia, adopted the 1996 Protocol to the London Convention ( the Protocol ) , which, when it enters into force, will supplant the London Convention.

Under the Protocol, Contracting Parties are obliged to take effectual steps, harmonizing to their scientific, proficient and economic capablenesss, to cut down and where operable eliminate pollution caused by dumping into the sea.

The Protocol embodies a more simplified, modern and comprehensive regulative model than the London Convention that is intended to supply greater protection to the marine environment.

Unlike the London Convention, the Protocol prohibits the dumping of all wastes or other affair into the sea, other than seven identified classs ( Annex 1 ) , capable to specific standards being met ( Annex 2 ) . These wastes or other affair are:

aˆ?dredged stuff ;

aˆ?sewage sludge ;

aˆ?fish waste, or material ensuing from industrial fish processing operations ;

aˆ?vessels and platforms or other semisynthetic constructions at sea ;

aˆ?inert, inorganic geological stuff ;

aˆ?organic stuff of natural beginning ; and

aˆ?bulky points chiefly consisting Fe, steel, concrete and likewise unharmful stuffs for which the concern is physical impact, and limited to those fortunes where such wastes are generated at locations, such as little islands with stray communities, holding no operable entree to disposal options other than dumping.

Under Annex 2, license appliers are required to carry on a waste bar audit ; formulate alternate waste direction schemes ; test all campaigner wastes against a contaminant thresholds determined by each party ( that is, an ‘action list ‘ ) ; assess the impact of dumping on the marine environment and supervise the consequences. Guidance is besides given on dumpsite choice.

The Protocol besides prohibits incineration at sea and the export of substances for dumping into the sea or incineration at sea, although it is of import to observe that there is an exigency state of affairs freedom in regard of these dumping and incineration regulations.

The autonomous unsusceptibility, normal operations and seabed excavation freedoms provided by the London Convention, as outlined above, are besides incorporated into the Protocol.

Australia signed the Protocol on 25 March 1998, thereby showing its purpose to be bound by that understanding, and on 19 July 2000, amendments to the Sea Dumping Act were passed4 by the Commonwealth Parliament to implement the Protocol.

On 4 December 2000, Australia officially ratified the Protocol by lodging an instrument of confirmation with the Secretary General of the International Maritime Organization.

Under international jurisprudence, Australia is still bound by the London Convention, until entry into force of the Protocol. Domestically, nevertheless, we now implement the Protocol, and, consequently, dumping agreements are capable to that model, as applied under the Sea Dumping Act5.

Industry Participation – Australian Government and Industry Partnership

At the 23rd Scientific Group Meeting, which was hosted by Australia in Townsville in May 2000, and at the 24th Scientific Group Meeting held in London in May 2001, the Australian Delegation included representatives of Australian Ports ( specifically, Ms Caryn Anderson, once of Townsville Port Authority, and Dr Rick Morton, of the Port of Brisbane Corporation ) .

This collaborative agreement for Scientific Group Meetings was an inaugural agreed between authorities and industry to better enable Australia to showcase its regulative model and environmental criterions, and its wealth of proficient expertness.

Given the success of these agreements, and the benefits and chances it offers to both authorities and industry, EA is acute to go on industry representation on the Australian Deputation at future meetings of the Scientific Group.

In peculiar, EA is interested in patronizing chances for Australian Industry representatives to showcase their expertness relevant to this forum, including important marine monitoring and research plans that ports in this state have undertaken.

To this terminal, Australia is acute to show to the Jamaica Workshop, which will predate the 25th Scientific Group Meeting in May 2002, information on dredging and dumping, and marine environment monitoring, with a peculiar accent on information that may be of involvement to the Caribbean part.

Equally, EA would wish to be able to show one or more Australian instance surveies at the 25th Scientific Group Meeting on environmental monitoring in relation to dredging and dumping plans.

Through AAPMA, EA would wish to hear from Australian industry representatives who may be interested in take parting in the Jamaica Workshop.

Further inside informations, including an docket, in regard of both the Jamaica Workshop and the twenty-fifth Scientific Group Meeting can be obtained from Mr Edward Kleverlaan, Marine and International Section, Department of the Environment and Heritage ( electronic mail: edward.kleverlaan @, tel: ( 02 ) 6274 1750, facsimile: ( 02 ) 6274 1006.

Any other questions regards the London Convention or the Protocol can be directed to Edward Kleverlaan.

1 Wastes or other affair is defined loosely in both the London Convention and the Protocol, so as to efficaciously embrace all affair.

2 Note, whilst there is an freedom under the Sea Dumping Act in regard of vass and aircraft of the Australian Defence Force, this freedom is narrower than is provided under the London Convention and the Protocol. Rather, the ADF freedom merely applies in relation to a state of affairs of armed struggle, or another exigency state of affairs. In all other fortunes, the ADF is required to follow with the London Convention and the Protocol, as implemented by the Sea Dumping Act.

3 Australia continued to allow Pasminco to dump jarosite generated from its Tasmanian works until October 1997.

4 Subsequently get downing to hold consequence on 16 August 2000

5 By following with the Protocol, Australia meets its duties under the London Convention.

London Convention Newsletter

Number 2

Environment Australia, June 2002

— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

Outcomes From the 25th Session of the Scientific Group to the London Convention and the LC/IMO/UNEP Workshop On Marine Pollution Prevention And Environmental Management In Ports In The Wider Caribbean Region


aˆ?The 25th Session of the Scientific Group

aˆ?Development of Waste Assessment Guidance

aˆ?Monitoring of the Marine Environment

aˆ?Long-term scheme for Technical Cooperation and Assistance

aˆ?Future Work Program

aˆ?Science Day on Design and Application of Bioassays

aˆ?Industry Representation


Environment Australia ( EA ) has prepared this newssheet to supply AAPMA members and industry by and large with information about Australia ‘s engagement at London Convention meetings. A short background to the London Convention and the 1996 Protocol can be found in the old Newsletter – the first in this series.

The 25th Session of the Scientific Group

The 25th Session of the Scientific Group to the Consultative Meeting of the Contracting Parties to the Convention on the Prevention of Marine Pollution by Dumping of Wastes and Other Matter, 1972 ( the London Convention ) , was held in Ocho Rios, Jamaica, from 27 to 31 May 2002.

The meeting was attended by deputations from 17 undertaking Parties, one associate member of the International Maritime Organization, three non-contracting parties and several international NGOs including the International Association of Ports and Harbours, World Organisation of Dredging Associations, the Permanent International Association of Navigation Congress.

Major issues for Australia included:

aˆ?Development of Waste Assessment Guidance ( trying guidelines and choice and analysis guidelines ) ;

aˆ?Monitoring of the marine environment ;

aˆ?Long term scheme for Technical Cooperation and Assistance ;

aˆ?Science twenty-four hours on Design and Application of Bioassays.

Australia undertook to supply information on the late released National Ocean Disposal Guidelines for Dredged Material and on its usage of bio-assaies to find the suitableness of dredged stuff for disposal at sea. Australia besides contributed, through the working groups, to the development of the Guidance paperss and presented its experiences on the stage out of dumping at sea of the industrial residue “ Jarosite ” .

The meeting was good run and provided an first-class forum to progress believing on the word picture of dredged stuff peculiarly those based on bio-assaies. Discussions besides focused on Action Levels used around the Earth and it was apparent that this needs to be farther developed by the group in the hereafter if a consonant attack is to be pursued.

The results of the meeting are set out below.

Development of Waste Assessment Guidance

The Scientific Group approved the bill of exchange Waste Assessment Guidance on Sampling for dredged stuff that was prepared jointly by Canada and the United States with input from Australia. The Guidance papers will be forwarded for acceptance to the 24th session of the CM, which will be held in London, 11-15 November 2002.

The Scientific Group besides considered the bill of exchange Generic Guidelines for the Selection of Physical, Chemical and Biological Parameters for the Assessment Dredged Material prepared by Intersessional Correspondence Group led by Germany. Australia provided input to several chapters in the papers. Further development of the text will be undertaken by the Intersessional Correspondence Group and it is intended that a concluding bill of exchange be submitted for consideration at the 26TH session of the Scientific Group.

Both counsel paperss are intended for those with limited experience in sampling and analysis of dredged stuff. This is of critical importance for conformity activities with both the Convention and the 1996 Protocol, and in regard of proficient co-operation issues under the Convention. Once adopted by the Consultative Meeting, the paperss will be amalgamated and be made available on the London Convention Web-Site.

Monitoring of the Marine Environment

There was extended treatment on the continued dumping of bauxite residue by Japan. The Scientific Group was non convinced by grounds presented, nevertheless, and concern was expressed sing the beginning, the destiny and environmental impact of contaminations in the stuff. The Scientific Group later requested Japan to foster behavior a scope of physical and biological impact appraisals and to describe these consequences to the following meeting of the SG. In holding to these petitions, Japan confirmed its purpose to cut down volumes and finally extinguish the demand for ocean disposal.

Long-run scheme for Technical Cooperation and Assistance

The Scientific Group recognised that, despite go oning support restraints, the Office of the London Convention had achieved a considerable sum in presenting proficient cooperation and aid in the past old ages, in peculiar, through four successful semiannual regional workshops, several state specific undertakings and the development of preparation and counsel paperss. However it was agreed that more necessary work could be done if the office was better resourced.

Future Work Program

In the context of the hereafter work program, the Scientific Group established a heavy future work plan with a series of clip bound marks. The plan includes the development of counsel on Action Levels ; a Regional Workshop either in Africa ( Kenya ) or Asia ( Japan ) and more treatments on monitoring in the Marine environment through a Science Day.

Science Day on Design and Application of Bioassays

The Scientific Group meeting included an informal twenty-four hours of scientific presentations on the design and application of bio-assaies for the word picture of dredged stuff. The presentations highlighted the strengths and failings of proving governments used in several states and cautiousness must be exercised in construing consequences.

A similar “ Science Day ” will be devoted to monitoring of the marine environment at the following Scientific Group meeting.

Industry Representation

Australian industry was unluckily unable to go to this meeting. However Environment Australia is acute to go on industry representation on the Australian Deputation at future meetings of the Scientific Group.

The following meeting of the Scientific Group will be held in London in May 2003.

LC/IMO/UNEP Workshop On Marine Pollution Prevention And Environmental Management In Ports In The Wider Caribbean Region

As you may be cognizant a Workshop on Marine Pollution Prevention and Environmental Management in Ports in the Wider Caribbean Region ( WCR ) was held in the hebdomad prior to the Scientific Group Meeting. The Workshop was besides held in Ocho Rios and was attended by some 87 representatives /participants from 22 states.

There was a strong presence from the UNEP Regional Environment Programme, which is based in Kingston, Jamaica and is the secretariat for the Cartagena Convention, an environmental understanding developed by and for states in the Wider Caribbean Region.

The programme for the hebdomad started with a series scene puting keynote references. Documents focused on the legal model for marine pollution direction ( London Convention, MARPOL 73/78, UNEP/GPA, Cartagena Convention ) , Environmental Management in Ports and Waste Management in the Wider Caribbean Region. Australia ‘s presentation on taint and direction of TBT ‘s in ports was good received.

The 2nd twenty-four hours was spent about wholly on Waste Assessment Guidance, while the 4th twenty-four hours was spent on assorted facets of dredged stuff direction, dumping of bulky stuffs and industrial waste, and, sewage direction. On the 3rd twenty-four hours a field trip to Kingston Harbour was undertaken. The Harbour was undergoing a major dredge operation utilizing the largest dredge in the universe and included visits to several renewal countries and the container port installations.

The Workshop programme so provided chances for states in the WCR to show instance surveies of peculiar relevancy to the part. Countries were enthusiastic and surveies were presented throughout the staying yearss of the Workshop with some scheduled points giving manner to interesting ad-hoc treatments that originated from within the plenary Sessionss and continued on into the dark.

These ad-hoc treatments led to the production of really utile recommendations for the part. A transcript of the bill of exchange recommendations can be obtained from the writer of this Newsletter, refer below. Another ad-hoc group discussed ballast H2O in the WCR and the approaching dialogues on the bill of exchange International Convention for the Control and Management of Ships ‘ Ballast Water and Sediments that is scheduled for completion at the terminal of 2003.

London Convention Newsletter

Number 3

Environment Australia, December 2002

— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —


aˆ?The Meeting of Parties


aˆ?Administrative and Fiscal Agreements

aˆ?Interpretation of the London Convention

aˆ?Review of Conclusions of WSSD

aˆ?London Convention Long-Term Work Programme

aˆ?Election of Chair and Vice-Chairs


Environment Australia ( EA ) has prepared this newssheet to supply the Association of Australian Ports and Marine Authorities ( AAPMA ) members and industry by and large, with information about Australia ‘s engagement at London Convention meetings. A short background to the London Convention and the 1996 Protocol can be found in Newsletter Number 1 – the first in this series.

The Meeting of Parties

The 24th Advisory Meeting ( CM ) of the Contracting Parties to the Convention on the Prevention of Marine Pollution by Dumping of Wastes and Other Matter, 1972 ( the London Convention ( LC ) ) , was held in London from 11 – 15 November 2002 under the chairmanship of John Karau ( Canada ) .

The meeting was attended by deputations from 32 undertaking parties ( Argentina ; Australia ; Belgium ; Bolivia, Brazil ; Canada ; Chile ; China ; Cyprus ; Denmark ; Egypt ; Finland ; France ; Germany ; Greece ; Iran ; Italy ; Japan ; Malta ; Netherlands ; Norway ; Panama ; Philippines ; Poland ; Republic of Korea ; Russian Federation ; South Africa ; Spain ; Sweden ; United Kingdom ; United States and Vanuatu ) one associate member of the International Maritime Organization ( Hong Kong, China ) nine non-contracting parties ( Bangladesh ; Colombia ; Democratic Peoples Republic of Korea ; Liberia ; Marshal Islands ; Singapore Trinidad and Tobago ; Venezuela ) , authorities and non-government administrations ( International Atomic Energy Agency ; International Association of Ports and Harbours ; Greenpeace International ; Permanent International Association of Navigation Congress ; Advisory Committee on Protection of the Sea and World Organization of Dredging Associations ) and an intergovernmental administration ( Environmental Crime Prevention Programme ) .

Below is an overview of results that may be of involvement to industry or other interested people.


The Meeting agreed to get down the development of “ conformity processs and mechanisms ” under article 11 of the 1996 Protocol and to convene an intersessional Correspondence Group led by Canada to analyze responses from Contracting Parties to a questionnaire aimed at puting the phase for treatment and drafting of conformity mechanisms and processs at the 25th CM. It was besides agreed to bespeak the Secretariat to fix a entry on conformity information associating to other Multilateral Environmental Agreements.

The meeting besides agreed to the Scientific Group recommendation to streamline and cut down the coverage demands associating to licenses.

Administrative and Fiscal Agreements: Report of the International Maritime Organisation-LC Working Group

The Meeting endorsed three nucleus recommendations of the Report of the IMO-LC Working Group. The Working group was set up to streamline administrative and fiscal agreements between IMO and LC. It was agreed that current organizational agreements and the proviso of secretariat services to the LC should be maintained and that, pending extroverted treatments of the Long-term Strategy for the LC, it was premature to do any recommendations on the integrating of the Technical Co-operation and Assistance Programme ( TCAP ) under the LC with IMO ‘s Integrated Technical Co-operation Programme ( ITCP ) . Exploiting linkages and partnering would prosecute farther cooperation between the two programmes.

The Meeting besides agreed to seek nucleus services from the IMO for:

aˆ?Secretariat support and conference services for CM and meetings of the Scientific Group, including intersessional work and, in the hereafter, for Meetings of Contracting Parties under the 1996 Protocol ;

aˆ?implementation of the TCAP under the LC, including support for capacity edifice in developing states ; preparatory work for entry into force of the 1996 Protocol ; and

aˆ?Secretariat support for execution of the LC and the 1996 Protocol, including the period of passage from the Convention to the Protocol.

Interpretation of the London Convention

Following a drawn-out treatment on the operation of the Lihir Gold Mine ( in Papua New Guinea, PNG ) it was decided that the Secretariat would compose to the PNG Government seeking elucidation on operations and dumping issues. The Secretariat was besides requested to reexamine environmental guidelines associating to the dumping of wastes in to the sea set down by World Bank and other bureaus runing in the same sector.

The continued dumping of bauxite residue off the seashore of Japan was besides reviewed. This activity is viewed by a big figure of deputations as dumping of industrial wastes, which is non permitted under the 1996 Protocol. Japan is working with a figure of states to happen a land-based solution and is besides analyzing the environmental impacts of the residue on the marine environment.

Following a presentation by the IMO-legal Division, it was noted that the IMO is presently developing a bill of exchange Convention on Wreck Removal ( DCWR ) at the enterprise of the US, Germany and The Netherlands. Under the DCWR, coastal States at hazard would be entitled to necessitate the registered proprietor of a wreck to take or pay for the remotion of the wreck where it poses a danger to pilotage or is a jeopardy to the marine environment. Any wreck in inquiry must be the consequence of a recent a nautical incident ( casualty ) .

Review of Conclusions of the World Summit on Sustainable Development ( WSSD )

The Meeting reviewed the Plan of Implementation and the Johannesburg Declaration on Sustainable Development. Mention was besides made to the UN Informal Consultative Process on Oceans, UNEP Regional Seas Programmes, UNEP/GPA, the US Type 2 enterprises ( White Water to Blue Water Initiative ) and the EU Marine Strategy ( in readying ) as possible avenues to advance the confirmation and accession to the 1996 Protocol including execution of its proficient co-operation activities.

Committednesss to Type 2 “ partnerships ” were made at the WSSD and are aimed at accomplishing on-the-ground and practical results.

Australia provided the meeting with information on its Type 2 enterprises and in peculiar, on the High Seas Biodiversity Workshop scheduled to take topographic point in Cairns from 17 to 20 June 2003. There was much involvement in these enterprises.

It was agreed that the LC would play an of import function in the regular planetary coverage procedure ( by 2004 ) , the UNEP/GPA conference in 2006 and the approaching UNEP General Council meeting ( 2003 ) .

London Convention Long-Term Work Programme

The Meeting considered three policy options on future strategic aims: position quo, position quo plus a moderate extension to a more holistic model for marine environmental protection, and, widening the model determinedly to turn to all land-based beginnings of marine pollution.

The Meeting agreed that the immediate precedence of the Long-term Work Programme was the execution of the LC and the publicity of the 1996 Protocol. Australia favours a closer working relationship with the UNEP/GPA and Regional Seas Programmes and supported moves to research greater coaction with other UN Agencies and international and regional organizations/programmes. The Meeting agreed that this should be strengthened for better execution of the Long-term Work Programme in order to construct on the commissariats of the WSSD Plan of Implementation.

Marine pollution

On this page

Sea dumping

Marine dust

Land based Marine pollution

Maritime pollution

Sea dumping

Australia presently regulates the deliberate burden, dumping and incineration of waste at sea under the Environment Protection ( Sea Dumping ) Act 1981 and the Environment Protection ( Sea Dumping ) Amendment Act 1986. The Waterss environing Australia ‘s coastline are progressively threatened by pollution from wastes dumped at sea. To cut down this menace, there are Australian Government Torahs that control dumping at sea.

Sea dumping web site

Dumping licenses

Licenses from the Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Humanistic disciplines are required for all sea dumping operations. Presently, about 30 licenses are issued in Australia per twelvemonth, chiefly for the dumping of uncontaminated dredge spoil. Applications can be obtained from the Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Humanistic disciplines or the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority ( if the dumping is to take topographic point within the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park ) .

Dumping license applications

Artificial reefs

Artificial Reefs are regulated under the Environment Protection ( Sea Dumping ) Act 1981. An application for a license to make an unreal reef must be obtained from the Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts. Additional licenses may besides be required under relevant State statute law.

Sea dumping – unreal reefs

An application for a license to make an unreal reef

Land based Marine pollution

Poor H2O quality and sediment quality are the most serious known pollution issues impacting Australia ‘s coastal and Marine environments. The 1995 State of the Marine Environment Report found that pollution from the land contributes up to 80 per centum of all marine pollution and is a major menace to the long-run wellness of nearshore marine systems. It affects ecological procedures, public wellness and societal and commercial usage of marine resources. For more information visit the State of the Environment, Coasts and Oceans Reporting. The undermentioned links are past and present Australian Government enterprises that promotes undertaking marine pollution at beginning.

The Australian Government ‘s current activities are:

Australia ‘s National Programme of Action for the Protection of the Marine Environment from Land-Based Activities

Integrated Coastal Zone Management

Reef Water Quality Protection Plan

Great Barrier Reef Coastal Wetlands Protection Program

Queensland Wetlands Program

Coastal acid sulphate dirts

Acid sulphate dirts ( ASS ) is the term normally given to dirts or sand that contain Fe sulphides ( fool’s gold ) . In an undisturbed province, coastal acid sulphate dirts are comparatively harmless. However, when exposed to O, through drainage or digging, sulphuric acid is produced in big measures. After rain, peculiarly following prolonged dry periods, this acid is mobilised in the dirt profile, transporting with it other liberated toxins such as heavy metals. This toxic cocktail finally flows into environing waterways significantly diminishing H2O quality.

National Coastal Acid Sulfate Soils

Maritime pollution

The Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts works co-operatively with other Australian Government and State bureaus on domestic and international maritime pollution policy and its execution. This includes engagement in the International Maritime Organisation and the domestic ANZECC Maritime Accidents and Pollution Implementation Group ( MAPIG ) . Current issues include ballast H2O, toxic anti-foulants, introduced marine plagues, pollution from transporting operations and marine dust.

International Maritime Organisation

Ballast H2O and introduced Marine plagues

Ballast H2O is a major beginning of Introduced Marine Pests. Australia ‘s Oceans Policy includes a committedness to set up a new comprehensive national direction system for incursions of introduced Marine plagues ( IMPs ) . The constitution of the new national system will happen through the execution of the December 1999 study of the National Taskforce on the Prevention and Management of Marine Pest Incursions.

Australia ‘s Oceans Policy

Introduced Marine Plagues

Anti fouling

The Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts has worked towards domestic and international prohibitions on antifouling pigments for ships that contain the toxic substance Tributlytin ( TBT ) . It besides supports a hereafter planetary prohibition on TBT now being developed through the International Maritime Organisation ( IMO ) . Under the Natural Heritage Trust, the Antifouling Program, funded undertakings that supported research into suited options to TBT based antifoulants, monitoring of their impacts, and community instruction.

For more information read about the past Anti fouling Program under Australia ‘s Oceans Policy of the Natural Heritage Trust

Marine waste response installations

Under the Natural Heritage Trust, the Marine Waste Reception Facilities Program funded undertakings that demonstrated the constitution of best pattern installations for the direction and intervention of marine waste at ports, marinas and boat seaports around Australia. Funding is no longer available for this plan.

Integrated Coastal Zone Management

The coastal zone is one of Australia ‘s greatest assets. The cardinal end of Integrated Coastal Zone Management ( ICZM ) is to keep, reconstruct or better the quality of coastal zone ecosystems and the societies they support. National cooperation is required to accomplish ecologically sustainable development through ICZM.

The Framework for a National Cooperative Approach to Integrated Coastal Zone Management, endorsed in October 2003, addresses both development and preservation challenges for coastal Australia that are of national graduated table and range. It recognises the demand for authoritiess to back up ongoing economic, societal and environmental good being in the coastal zone. It sets the scene for national cooperation in pull offing coastal issues and guaranting effectual and complementary agreements within and across legal powers, and to better reflect the involvements of coastal stakeholders.

The six precedence countries addressed in the Model are:

aˆ?integration across the catchment seashore ocean continuum

aˆ?land and Marine based beginnings of pollution

aˆ?climate alteration

aˆ?pest workss and animate beings

aˆ?planning for population alteration

aˆ?capacity edifice

While legal powers have different legislative and administrative models for pull offing the coastal zone, following a national concerted attack seeks to turn to cross boundary line and sectoral issues, harmonise joint action towards direction of common issues, and promote investings from all legal powers.

An execution program that seeks nationally concerted results within nominated timeframes has now been released. The National Cooperative Approach to Integrated Coastal Zone Management – Model and Implementation Plan sets out, under the strategic precedence countries, execution aims and actions required to turn to coastal direction issues. Actions identified in the execution program will construct on bing coastal direction enterprises at all degrees of authorities and, where executable, will be achieved through the efficient allotment of bing resources.