The Chocolate Market Industry Economics Essay

The cocoa market industry has been around in the UK since the nineteenth century. Since so, many different houses have developed and established themselves in the market, ensuing in a competitory market. Therefore, this undertaking will concentrate on how the UK cocoa market construction has changed and evolved over the old ages and the causes of this. Our undertaking will be chiefly based on analyzing the cocoa company ‘Cadbury ‘ and their tendency in gross revenues, along with other factors which has caused the coup d’etat of Cadbury by Kraft Foods. From this, we will be able to find the factors which caused the alteration of market portions original Cadbury has.

Outline the tendency in gross revenues by the major cocoa makers in the UK over the last 10 old ages, and analyse the construction of the UK cocoa industry.

Western Europe is the largest cocoa market in the universe ( Haymarket Network Ltd. June 2012 ) and Britain has the biggest confectionary market among the European Union ( Barnett 2006 ) . Furthermore the UK has the 7th highest ingestion of cocoa in the universe. The mean Brit consumes 17.49lbs of cocoa per twelvemonth ( The World Atlas of Chocolate 2000 ) .

Since the last 10 old ages the cocoa confectionery sells has grown significantly. During the period of 2000-2005 the compound one-year growing rate for cocoa gross revenues in per centum was about 2.5 % Euro. The estimated value of the gross revenues for 2005 was a‚¬6,214m ( Euromonitor International 2005 ) .

Additionally, harmonizing to Mintel – United kingdom market research house, the cocoa market in the state reached ?3,976 billion in 2011, a 21 % addition over a five-year period and 7.5 % growing since 2010. As the people seem to go on buying cocoa, even more than earlier, this is certain premiss for affecting immense cocoa participants in strive for bigger market portion in the state.

In the last 10 old ages the cocoa market in United Kingdom was dominated by several companies. Since 2010, when Kraft took over Cadbury, three companies dominated the market with control over 83 per centum in 2011 – Nestle , Mars and Cadbury/Kraft.

Figure 1. Percentage of market portion in the UK cocoa industry ( Trading Visions 2011 )

Other large companies involved in the UK market are – Hershey, Thorntons, Ferrero, Lindt, Divine cocoa and others. The Mintel released tabular array in 2012th explains more detail the alterations in the market cocoa portion during the last twosome of old ages.



2011 ( est )

% alteration








Kraft Foods ( Cadbury )








Red planets
























William thorntons








Lindt & A ; Sprungli








Sum of the above
































Figure 2. Percentage alteration in market portions in the UK cocoa market, by value, 2009-11 ( Mintel 2012 )

The atomization between few big companies in the cocoa confectionary industry is a mark for oligopolistic construction of the market. During last 10 old ages, the state of affairs changed several times. Brand owned by Cadbury, Daily Milk, grew 11,7 % from ?374m to ?418m in 2010 while Kraft brand’sMilk?° gross revenues increased from ?8,7m to ?21,3m harmonizing to Miggiano ( category vice-president for cocoa in the UK ) . Normally an oligopoly exists when the top five or less houses in the market history for more than 60 % of entire market demand/sales ( Econ 100 n.d. ) . Therefore it can be concluded that the state of affairs of the market construction is surely an oligopoly. A typical feature for oligopolistic competition is the large sums spent for advertisement. The taking company Cadbury spends 1000000s for advertisement every twelvemonth, for illustration for their new cocoa saloon “ Crispello ” they have prepared 7 million? from their budget ( Mail online 2012 ) .

In the UK cocoa industry there are known to be several barriers to entry, lending to the construction of the market. The immense capital needed for get downing concern in the market is the chief obstruction for new houses. Ad and selling could besides be classed as a major barrier to entry, where refering the oligopolistic confectionary houses. This is because some companies may hold the fiscal power to win over consumer trueness with their expensive stigmatization. Therefore, the contestability of the market can be questioned as market houses with well- established, branded merchandises make it instead hard and more expensive for new houses to come in into the market successfully. However there are a batch of cocoa houses in the industry, with little net incomes and portion. An illustration is the Divine Chocolate company, which is good known for its just trade policy.

Explain why Kraft Foods wanted to take over Cadbury. To what extent do you believe the statements against this coup d’etat were valid?

Cadbury is known to be one of the largest confectionary companies in the universe. The British owned company was founded in 1824 and has been in being since. However, in February 2010, Kraft Foods Group a reputable company within their ain rights took over the multi-billion lb concern, which caused important indignation. The unprecedented event meant that Cadbury did non anticipate other houses to offer for the company, particularly when it was non for sale. However, Kraft Foods had other purposes saying that ‘The British candymaker offers Kraft greater entree to crisp growing in emerging markets every bit good as some of the universe ‘s prima cocoa ‘ ( Ruddick 2010 ) . It is hence, apparent that Kraft wanted to coup d’etat Cadbury strictly for economic addition, and to raise the company ‘s profile and repute amongst other respectable markets. Kraft Foods felt this was the perfect chance to make so and as a consequence, forcefully imposed a trade on Cadbury which they felt was sufficient plenty for Cadbury to transfer/ give up their assets ( company ) . This is besides apparent in this statement which mentions that ‘Not merely was Cadbury non for sale, but it actively resisted the Kraft coup d’etat ‘ ( Moeller 2012 ) .

Additionally, recent information suggests it is besides problematic whether statements in resistance of the coup d’etat were valid, peculiarly due to Cadbury ‘s net incomes increasing in recent old ages. Telegraph staff and bureaus ( The Telegraph 2012 ) indicates that the purchase of Cadbury by Kraft allowed for Cadbury to be reinstated into the planetary market where consumerism remains at big. ‘Kraft has reported strong gross revenues and net income additions in the first full one-fourth since it took over Cadbury. Gross saless rose 25 % to $ 12.3bn ( ?7.75bn ) in the three months to 30 June, and Cadbury accounted for 90 % of the additions. Net net incomes were up 13.3 % to $ 937m ( ?590.1m ) , compared with $ 827m ( ?521m ) in 2009 ( Barker 2010 ) . Therefore, leting for Cadbury to spread out and increase its profitableness. It can hence be said, that although some felt discerning towards the move of Cadburys ownership, it seems to hold been for the better. With MP Steve McCabe even saying ‘ ” I think the investing is what ‘s important to the long term hereafter, ” and pointed out that Kraft had besides expanded the research and development subdivision ‘ . On the other manus, ‘Now, about two old ages on since the hostile coup d’etat in February 2010, the house has announced a farther 200 occupation cuts, the company has given no specific confidences over the hereafter of 4,500 UK occupations ‘ ( BBC 2011 ) . Therefore, proposing that those against the transportation of the company did doubtless hold grounds to be concerned. An extra article even goes farther to propose ‘Kraft already has a path record of cutting production and traveling production abroad. There ‘s no warrant that they ‘ll maintain production in the UK in the long tally ‘ ( BBC 2010 ) . This indicates that there were deductions of giving permission to Kraft to manage the company. Yet, this hazard was still taken transfusing fright in workers who were already discerning of this passage. This suggests statements against the coup d’etat were so valid.

Overall, it can be argued in this subdivision that although Kraft, being a well-established company with a strong portfolio to construct upon, it caused much contention in its coup d’etat of Cadbury. The add-on of Cadbury to the house means that Kraft is able to emerge in markets successfully that they were restricted from earlier. Many argued that the coup d’etat allowed for Cadbury to develop farther into planetary markets instead than staying in the UK. The company became progressively profitable and as a consequence, a popular one in which many are interested in puting. However, with the good comes the bad and in a state of affairs as such, it meant that the UK staff of Cadbury were at hazard of losing their occupations. This would happen if Kraft moved the Cadbury concern abroad, which has partly occurred since. Kraft has produced good consequences for Cadbury but non without doing deductions in the UK ( where Cadbury originates from ) . It can be stated from the research grounds that the purposes behind Kraft ‘s coup d’etat of Cadbury are rather clear and the resistance statements of the UK Cadbury staff and the UK authorities are most surely valid as displayed throughout this subdivision.

On a chart show what has happened to the UK lb ( sterling ) against the dollar between December 2007 and September 2012

Beginning: Bank of England

Using a supply and demand diagram, explicate this alteration in the greatest exchange rate against the US dollar.

The exchange rate is the rate at which one currency trades for another on the foreign exchange market. On the unfastened market monetary values of goods, trade goods and value of state ‘s currency ( under a floating exchange rate ) are subordinated to the control of two forces- supply and demand ( Sloman:360 ) . By and large, the exchange rate is determined by the cardinal jurisprudence of the market organizing an equilibrium rate ( monetary value ) by comparing demand and supply of the currency. One of the primary Torahs of supply and demand indicates that high supply causes low monetary values and high demand consequences in high monetary values. This fact implies that when there is a rich supply of a peculiar good so the monetary value should fall and frailty versa. The monetary value additions when there is a scarceness of the merchandise. Consequently, an addition in the demand of a trade good would do it to appreciate in value, whereas an addition in supply would do it to deprecate ( Capital Market Services 2012 ) . The alteration in the exchange rate of UK lb sterling to US dollar can be explained utilizing a basic supply and demand diagram.1.jpg

Figure 1

Figure 1 shows a normal downward spilling demand curve. A lessening in the monetary value of the lb in relation to dollars from $ 2 to $ 1 will do British exports in the USA to go much cheaper than the domestic merchandise. The demand for British export will lift in the USA, and in a consequence, the demand for British currency to purchase these goods will increase, as the Americans will hold to interchange their money for British lbs. Therefore, at lower monetary values ( lower exchange rate ) more lbs will be demanded, and frailty versa. Motions up the perpendicular axis represent an addition in monetary value of the lb, which is tantamount to a autumn in the monetary value of the dollar. Similarly, motions down the perpendicular axis represent a lessening in the monetary value of the lb ( Capital Market Services 2012 ) .


Figure 2

Figure 2 describes the supply side of the finding of the exchange rate. When UK importers wish to purchase goods from USA, they will provide lbs on the foreign exchange market in order to obtain dollars. The higher the exchange rate, the more dollars they will acquire for their lbs ( Sloman 2009:360 ) . If the monetary value of lb in relation to dollar rises from $ 1.50 to $ 2, monetary value of imports from the USA will fall. Assuming the monetary value snap of demand for the American imports is greater than one, the sum of lbs that UK consumers will necessitate to provide in order to obtain the dollars to purchase the goods- will lift. The supply curve slopes up because British houses and consumers are willing to purchase a greater measure of American goods as the dollar becomes cheaper ( i.e. they receive more dollars per lb ) . Therefore, the higher the exchange rate, the more lbs will be supplied ( Sloman 2009:360 ) .


Figure 3 Based on Sloman 2008:162

Suppliers and consumers meet at a peculiar measure and monetary value at which they are both satisfied, known as the equilibrium monetary value pictured by Figure 3. At any higher monetary value there would be an extra supply of British lbs that would drive monetary value down. A lower monetary value would do a deficit of lbs driving the monetary value up. In pattern, the procedure of making equilibrium is instantaneous. The foreign exchange traders working for the Bankss are endlessly seting the rate as new clients make new demands for currencies ( Sloman 2009:361 ) .


Figure 4 Based on Sloman 2008: 161

A alteration in the exchange rate is caused by any displacement in the supply and demand curves. When the demand and supply curves shift from D1 and S1to D2 and S2 severally the exchange rate will fall from $ 1.60 to $ 1.40. A lessening in the free-market exchange rate is called depreciation, an addition is an grasp.

Explain the impact of this alteration in the value of sterling against the US dollar on a UK cocoa maker who buys chocolate beans which are priced in dollars

Appreciation of lb against dollar is most good for importers, like given UK cocoa maker who buys chocolate beans priced in dollars. They are advantages as they need to happen fewer lbs to purchase their imported goods. Depreciation of place currency makes foreign purchasers disadvantages as they need to happen more money to pay for their imports ( tutor2u ) . Therefore, in this illustration the best clip for foreign investings was between December 2007 and June 2008 when the lb exchange rate was the highest.

Outline the causes of the current recession in the UK. Using relevant economic theory demo how recession affected the UK economic system.

Economist and experts still disagree on the definition of recession. However, technically talking, the economic system of a state would skid into recession when it experiences two continual quarters of negative economic growing. This happens when the GDP would hold to contract on a one-fourth by one-fourth footing for a entire period of six months. GDP ( gross domestic merchandise ) is the entire sum of goods and services produced by a state in a given period of clip.

The recognition crunch that began in August 2007 brought recession in Britain and other states across the universe. Soon everything worsened dramatically and turned into planetary fiscal crisis in the fall of 2008. The recession started in America where mortgage companies got into monolithic debt by giving out many subprime mortgages. They so bundled this debt on to other states such as the UK by borrowing from abroad to finance this hazardous lending.The cardinal job of UK was Britain ‘s Bankss, which had invested their militias in those package ‘s or effects that turned out to be insecure, illiquid or even worthless. As UK Bankss began to fight, the authorities allowed them to impart to each other to advance liquidness. They did non cognize that this would ensue in even more debt and tenseness between the Bankss. Consumer assurance dropped dramatically down. Along with the overvalued lodging market eventually neglecting, ingestion began to fall.The British economic system was officially declared to be in a recession in January 2009, when the Office for National Statistics ( ONS ) announced that the estimation of gross domestic merchandise ( GDP ) showed a autumn of 1.5 per cent in the last three months of 2008 after a 0.6 per cent bead in the old one-fourth. This was the biggest quarter-on-quarter diminution since 1980 and the first clip the economic system had been in recession since 1991. ONS figures show that GDP fell by 2.4 per cent in the first one-fourth of 2009 compared with the last one-fourth of 2008. GDP fell by a farther 0.7 per cent in the 2nd one-fourth of 2009, go forthing the degree of GDP 5.5 per cent lower than in the 2nd one-fourth of 2008, the largest one-year autumn on record ( ONS 2009 ) .

It was the deepest recession since the war. The Manufacturing end product was down 7 % by terminal 2008. It has affected many sectors including Bankss and investing houses. Many well-known and established concerns went bankrupt. Britain has struggled to come out of the latest recession, with much guess of a ‘double dip ‘ recession during the 2010s. Output fell by 0.5 % in the fourth one-fourth of 2010. The unemployment rate rose to 8.1 % ( 2.57m people ) in August 2011, the highest degree since 1994. As of January 2012 [ update ] , after 15 quarters, GDP is still 4 % down from extremum at start of recession. And now terminal of 2012 there are besides guess of a ‘triple dip ‘ recession.

Explain the statement about chocolate, mentioning to the relevant types of snap.

Supply conditions play a large function in terming the monetary value of cocoas. Since Cocoa is a farm merchandise it is capable to fast-developing alterations in turning conditions. Ivory Coast is the biggest and Ghana the 2nd biggest manufacturer of chocolate tree hence if any viruses, like the scrawny shoot disease, or any bad conditions conditions affect their crop will hold effects on the cocoa monetary values. On the other side good conditions conditions will hike supply and drop the monetary values. Capriciousness of monetary values is increase by the fact that chocolate demand is really inelastic. In the US, short-run snap of demand has been estimated at about -0.2, and is even lower in some large European consumer states ( Henri Jason 1994 ) . When demand is inelastic, even a little displacement in the supply curve can bring forth a large alteration in the market monetary value.

IEoD = ( % Change in Quantity Demanded ) / ( % Change in Income )

Another factor that determines the monetary values of cocoa is the strong income snap of demand. For illustration in the United States, a 10 % addition in income has been estimated to increase per capita cocoa ingestion by 9.2 % ( Henri Jason 1994 ) . Income snap is non lot different in other states. The recession makes people believe they should pass less and most of the instances people do gain less money or they have late lost their occupation because of the fiscal crisis. Therefore they have less to pass. This will impact their pick between normal goods and luxury goods. If chocolate becomes excessively expensive they might go luxury good for some people, at the minute it is a normal good for most people.


Beginning: tutor2u

As a portion of your decision, assess the hereafter of the major cocoa companies inthe UK. Make you anticipate future growing, stagnancy or diminution?

Overall, it is apparent that many factors influence the cocoa market in today ‘s universe. In recent old ages the best market determination by assorted cocoa companies was offering a assortment of merchandises to the consumer market. This scheme led to large net incomes for the biggest participants in the industry, as they could afford the expensive advertisement for their merchandises. However, the tendency for cocoa purchases has non slowed down regardless of the economic state of affairs. In fact opposite to logic, people seem to hold taken advantage from cocoa merchandises in the recession, as they have spent more clip remaining place during the difficult times of the British economic stagnancy. On vacations such as Easter and Christmas, purchases for some specific merchandises has doubled, tripled or even more compared to the remainder of the twelvemonth. Harmonizing to professional research workers of the cocoa tendencies, like Mintel, the hereafter of the cocoa market in UK will confront a growing in the following several old ages. However, as a group we believe based on the grounds from this undertaking, that the UK cocoa industry could potentially be dominated by foreign companies, ensuing in stagnancy for British cocoa companies.