The old money

F. Scott Fitzgerald uses his novel The Great Gatsby as a manner to compare old and new money and to exemplify the deficiency of ethical motives in those with old money. The chief character, Jay Gatsby, stand foring Fitzgerald ‘s personification of new money, makes his life merchandising intoxicant illicitly. He earns his money rapidly and is now demoing it off with fabulous parties in his outsize sign of the zodiac in West Egg. Another character, Tom Buchanan, represents old money being the “ scion of those pitiless coevalss who raised up the great American lucks. ” Both act out their dreams. Gatsby ‘s is to acquire Daisy while Tom ‘s is to wholly possess Daisy every bit good as to look as a all-around rational. Tom and others in his category inherited their money and live elegantly in East Egg. Gatsby, who is on the surface an immoral individual and the personification of new money, turns out to be a better individual than those egoistic owners of the old money.

Gatsby lives in West Egg, a town comparable to Hollywood, which is really superficial, fast traveling, and full of immoralities. He is thought to be the personification of new money by Nick and others that surrounded him because he showed off his wealth by throwing big parties, dressing showily, and having many excessively epicurean ownerships. One of the most utmost looks of his is his auto, described as “ a rich pick colour, bright with Ni, swollen here and at that place in its monstrous length with exultant hatboxes and supper-boxes and tool boxes, and terraced with a maze of air current shields that mirrored a twelve Sun. Siting down behind many beds of glass in a kind of green leather conservatory… ” His auto is really noticeable, “ Everybody had seen it. ” ( Fitzgerald 68 ) . Another illustration of Gatsby flashing his wealth is the big parties he throws ; in fact they are so big he hires excess aid to clean up after the weekend is over. To some Gatsby is merely flashing his wealth but all of his actions revolve around his ultimate end, Daisy. He bought his house to be near to her, he shows off so she would take notice to him, and he did non care who came to his parties. In fact really few of the people who attended his parties had been really invited, but he allows this in hopes that Daisy would go to. This is merely an utmost illustration of the personification of the upper category, but non as Richard Chase ‘s unfavorable judgment, which suggests that the characters are represented realistically. The characters are non representative of world. The characters presented in The Great Gatsby are hyperboles of Fitzgerald ‘s perceptual experiences of their societal category.

East Egg is place to those with old money. This is a town with big epicurean white houses straight across the bay, and in contrast to, West Egg. This is place to the elegant and sophisticated old money that lacks ethical motives. Their ownerships are bland colored. Their houses, autos, and apparels all were white or really bland. Daisy wears white frocks, drives a white auto, and lives in a white house and Tom wears tan suits. These represent their deficiency of substance and apprehension. Because of this deficiency of understanding they lack ethical motives. Tom systematically cheats on his married woman. Daisy besides is without ethical motives ; she deliberately kills her hubby ‘s girlfriend and systematically takes advantage of Gatsby, utilizing him without even sing go forthing Tom for him because he was non rich plenty. Fitzgerald uses these characters to demo that even though old money looks respectable and sophisticated it lacks ethical motives. Even though on the surface new money looks immoral, its motivations are pure and its ends are good.

Gatsby sets a end for himself that he would make anything to go rich ; in order to stop up with Daisy. He takes the stereotyped path of going rich in West Egg, offense. He starts “ drug shops ” that were really foreparts for selling intoxicant. Tom Buchanan earned some of his money by working ; he already achieved most of his success, and the overpowering bulk by heritage. Marius Bewley proves this in the literary unfavorable judgment. He states in his article, “ Scott Fitzgerald ‘s Criticism of America ” , that Gatsby and Tom are opposites. One of the biggest differences is their agencies. Gatsby illicitly makes his money, to back up his dream, and Tom has already earned his money. This shows Bewley ‘s position that Gatsby ‘s dreams are doing his possible forever increasing, while Tom has already reached his extremum and is on his manner down, he merely sells stocks for enjoyment. Another illustration of how Fitzgerald shows the two as antonyms is that Gatsby turned a stable into a garage for his autos, and Tom changed his garage into a stable, demoing them as exact antonyms. An of import antonym between the two is their physical characteristics. Gatsby is described, page 6, as “ Having something gorgeous about him. ” This is in direct contrast to Tom who had “ A cruel organic structure capable of much purchase. ” ( Fitzgerald11 ) . The differences between the two are really great. Gatsby is described as “ Very careful about adult females. He would ne’er so much as expression at a friends married woman. ” ( Fitgerald 77 ) . Gatsby ‘s thoughts about Daisy are different, since he loved her since before she was married. Tom is really different ; he does n’t love Daisy. He cheats on his married woman invariably. But he holds Daisy to him, by utilizing the necklace. She gets married in it, as if being forced to, without any look, described on page 81.This besides shows how small is thought of matrimony by the East Eggers, as to non be devoted adequate about the chance of matrimony to be nervous about its long term committedness.

Gatsby ‘s dream was to hold reciprocated love from Daisy. All the actions that he had taken since they had met are in chase of this end. He is really active in prosecuting her, and after he catches her oculus he is loyal to her. The greatest look of his trueness is that he took the incrimination for Daisy ‘s blazing action in killing her hubby ‘s kept woman, Myrtle. Even after that Gatsby looks out for Daisy by waiting by her house to be certain Tom would non be huffy at her. Though Gatsby did all these things for Daisy she still did non go forth her hubby for him. The most influential ground for this is that Tom used an expensive battle nowadays, a 350 thousand dollar pearl necklace, to “ concatenation ” her to him. This thought is described in Arthur Mizener ‘s literary unfavorable judgment. “ Tom uses these agencies to obtain and command Daisy. ” ( Bewley ) . The pearls were around her cervix “ like a concatenation. ” Even though she is clearly attached to Tom ; Gatsby ‘s trueness to Daisy is what finally led to his slaying.

The concluding illustration of the condescending sloppiness of the East Eggers is Tom and Daisy ‘s flight. At the terminal of the novel they both flee, go forthing all the things that they had “ Carelessly set into gesture ” which consequences in deceases and unneeded adversities that they had caused in other people ‘s lives. Daisy merely wanted to hold her ain merriment with Gatsby, even though she was knew was bound to Tom. Tom had heedlessly set up the whole incident with Myrtle that led to Gatsby taking the incrimination, and to his decease.

Since those with old money populating a flat life without passion provide such a contrast to the new money slaves, the attractive force between the two is inevitable. “ Tomorrow we will run quicker, stretch out our weaponries farther… And one all right morning- so we beat on, boats against the current, borne back endlessly into the yesteryear. ”