The Social Conflicts Of Two Cities English Literature Essay

As with any historical fiction of work of literature, struggle is a neccesary component in a novel. It is chiefly used to construct secret plan and suspense. A Narrative of Two Cities written by Charles Dickens and Ivanhoe by Sir Walter Scott are both good illustrations of novels in which struggles between play an of import function and in this novel it is chiefly the battles between societal groups which are of large importance. There are a batch of differences but besides similarities refering the points of position of the storytellers on the battles between the societal groups. In this essay I will discourse these differences and similarities between the sentiments of Sir Walter Scott and Charles Dickens on societal struggles.

Devils used the development of a struggle between the Gallic lower category and the Gallic authorities and nobility to construct secret plan and suspense. The aristocracy ( the authorities and nobility ) is highly rich and the Gallic lower category are precisely the antonym, really hapless. The Gallic lower category suffered for a long clip under the tight opinions and restraints of the Gallic authorities and nobility. The lives of nescient Gallic hapless people are described by Charles Dickens as awful:

“ And who among the company at Monsignor ‘s response in that 17 hundred and 80th twelvemonth of our Lord, coud perchance uncertainty, that a system rooted in a frizzled hangman, powdered and gold-laced, pumped, and white-silk stockinet, would see the really stars out! ”[ i?› ]1i??

The deceases of apparently worthess peasant-like hapless people had no affect what so of all time upon the wealthy. This created the strong and continual struggle between the two, wholly opposite from eachother, categories in France. The hapless rebelled against the blue bloods who had been suppressing them for so long and afterwards France took a long clip to retrieve. Darnay was arrested twice chiefly because he was born fundamentally as a Frech blue blood and revolutionaries wanted him killed. With the aid of others, Darnay ‘s struggle was resolved, but no uncertainty still stands an single illustration of the larger external struggle of the Revolution.

It seems that the storyteller of A Tale of Two Cities does non desire or cognize to take a side in the struggle between the Gallic lower category and the Gallic authorities and nobility. He does non O.K. the actions of aristocracy but he does non O.K. the actions of the hapless people as good. Particularly in the first two paragraphs of chapter 15 ( book the 3rd ) the storyteller uses really negative and sometimes strong words for the hapless people but besides for the baronial people. Wordss like Monsters, the passenger cars of absolute sovereign, the materiels of feuda Lords, the toilettes of flame uping Jezebels, changeless and hopeless are used rather frequently. In the full novel it is besides really clear that he sometimes understands the aristocracy and at another minute he understands the hapless people. He besides understands the reaction of the hapless people but so at the same clip he does non O.K. this. It is shown in the first paragraph already:

“ It was the best of times, it was the worst of times, it was the age of wisdom, it was the age of folly, it was the era of belief, it was the era of disbelief, it was the season of Light, it was the season of Darkness, it was the spring of hope, it was the winter of desperation, we had everything before us, we had nil before us, we were all traveling direct to Heaven, we were all traveling direct the other way- in short, the period was so far like the present period, that some of its noisiest governments insisted on its being received, for good or for evil, in the greatest grade of comparing merely. ” ( Charles Dickens, p. 3 )

Devils is now contrasting things to demo or stress how everything has two sides in the clip of the Gallic Revolution as good ; the side of the Lords and the side of the hapless people. The storyteller ‘s sentiment is so that both sides are non moving justly and both are doing errors. The position of the storyteller is so that the lower category people have good grounds to move the manner they do, grounds like the manner they have been treated by the aristocracy but at the same clip he thinks the aristocracy is treated excessively severely for the brutal things which happened or which they did in the yesteryear.

The societal struggles in Ivanhoe are rather different from the battles in A Tale of Two Cities. The chief battle in Ivanhoe is the struggle between the Saxons and the Normans. The lines of this struggle, which is traveling to rule the remainder of the novel, are already drawn in the first chapter. Chapter 1 makes really clear already how divided the state is between Normans and Saxons and how the Norman Lords have established a dictatorship. Another struggle that started merely a few chapters subsequently was that of the antisemitism. The Christian characters in the fresh dainty Isaac as an castaway because in mediaeval Europe, the Jews were a detested race because they continued to pattern their ain faith. Scott ‘s portrayal of Isaac has much in common with the usual stereotype of the Jew. Isaac is a money-lender and hence presented as covetous, being overly concerned with money. The epigraph at the beginning of Chapter 5 is really relevant for the portrayal of Isaac:

“ Hath non a Jew eyes? Hath non a Jew custodies, variety meats, dimensions, fondnesss, passions? Fed with the same nutrient, injury with the same arms, capable to the same diseases, healed by the same means, warmed and cooled by the same winter and summer, as a Christian is?

Merchant of Venice ”[ i?› ]2i??

This citation and logically this whole drama from Shakespeare has a batch of antisemitism elements, but the citation Scott selected for his epigraph besides shows human sides. Subsequently in this fresh Isaac is distraught when Rebecca is kidnapped by De-Bois Guilbert. Isaac ‘s love for his girl so softens the antisemitism nowadays in his word picture as does his generousness toward Ivanhoe. Another of import struggle in Ivanhoe is that between Ivanhoe and De-|Bois Guilbert, it really started before the novel started and continues at the tourney in Ashby. This is non merely a struggle between the Norman and Saxon but besides between true gallantry and false gallantry. Ivanhoe is a Saxon but he still possesses all the finest qualities of gallantry, whereas the corrupt De Bois-Guilbert reveals gallantry at its worst. Another battle between opposed braces in the novel is that between Prince John and King Richard. That John is an unattractive character has already been suggested in chapter 7: “ utmost arrogance and indifference to the feeling of others ” .

On the whole it is really clear that the storyteller chiefly symphatizes with the Saxons. Nothing good is said about the Normans while the Saxons are said to be “ courageous knights ” . The terminal is about merely about the Saxons, the matrimony of Ivanhoe and Rowena. Besides about the societal battle of the Jews, the storyteller chooses really clear one side. He is on the side of the Jews chiefly because he is making such a positive image of Hebrews by portraying Rebecca as sort, reasonably, caring and guiltless miss. This position of the storyteller is precisely the antonym of how the Jews are treated usually by the people.

The chief differences in the sentiments of the storyteller on the societal battles is that of the positiveness and sympathising with one side or both sides. Dickens does non cognize or seems to non desire to take a side. He thinks both are doing errors and both are non moving wholly right but still he can understand the hapless people every bit good as the authorities and nobility. Scott is making the antonym, he is sympathising with the Jews and stating positive things about them and about life in entire in that clip.

The chief similarity between the storytellers ‘ sentiments is that of portraying people better than they really are. Dickens is giving a batch of statements why both, the aristocracy and the Gallic lower Ca, are good in some manner or another. He besides could hold left this out because they both did monsterous things to eachother so why should he sort of forgive them by besides adverting the positive sides. This does surprise the reader and makes the reader more able to understand the characters, which is likely why he did this. Scott does this every bit good with Rebecca and Isaac. Another similarity is that both used the struggles to construct up the suspense and secret plan, without these struggles between the societal groups at that place would hold been no plot line at all.

To reason, there are some differences and some similarities as good between the two novels refering the sentiment of the storyteller about the societal battles. Both Dickens and Scott used the struggle between the societal groups to construct suspense and the secret plan. But at the same clip they used different literary techniques to do things clear. One sympathizes with people while the other does non, this gives the reader different images of the societal struggles. So in the terminal it is shown once more that both ways of narrating and utilizing struggles as a sort of plot line leads to a well done work of literature.