Version Of The Political History English Literature Essay

In Tharoors Indo-nostalgic allegorical design, Indian democracy represented in the individual of Draupadi, has a assorted parenthood. She is the merchandise of an illicit brotherhood of Nehru and Edwina, which signifies that India came into being because of their unhallowed confederation. Through her matrimony to Arjun, Draupadi is shared by his other brothers who personify “ The hopes and the restrictions of each of the national establishments they served. ” ( p. 319 ) During Nehru ‘s term of office, her wellness remained stable, but started deteriorating after his decease, particularly during the clip of Mrs. Gandhi. The narrative records how after the short enchantment of Shishu Pal ‘s term of office in office, the seniors chose Mrs. Gandhi to take the party, chiefly because they thought her fictile.

Nehru ‘s Fabian ideals of industrialization and modernization are explained with slums, deficiency of electricity, imbibing H2O, instruction and employment. Tharoor makes a satirical wordplay on the ministry of External Affairs by naming it the ministry of Eternal Affairs. The minutess that can be made in yearss go on for hebdomads and even longer, it means it goes everlastingly. They are adept at losing of import and pressing paperss. The writer makes an puzzling comment on Nehru ‘s house belief in parliamentary democracy:

aˆ¦for all Dhritarashtra wickednesss and restrictions that was one strong belief he ne’er betrayed even though or possibly because he let no 1 else come near to being premier curate, he invariably reaffirmed and encouraged the establishment of parliamentary democracy in the state. ( p.370 )

The portrayal of Nehru presented in the novel is non at all a blandishing one. It seems to equilibrate history of Nehru ‘s function in the state ‘s political relations given by official hagiographists of the Congress Party and authorities. The basic thought of his function is derived from that of blind Dhritarashtra. This metaphorical sightlessness, together with his immense self-importance and deep aspiration, made him an appropriate Indo-nostalgic paradigm of Dhritarashtra. The narrative clearly suggests that he gained significance in the party hierarchy because of Gandhi ‘s approvals. The fresh histories how, as the state ‘s first premier curate, he bungled the Kashmir issue and evinced his deficiency of foresight by one-sidedly taking it to the United Nations. Tharoor traces his errors to his myopia:

Dhritarashtra was guilty merely of the falseness of the blind. ( p. 295 )

The lone recognition Tharoor gives to India ‘s first premier curate is that he was, despite his restrictions and drawbacks, a true Indian Democrat.

Indo-nostalgia through the Image of Indira Gandhi:

Shashi Tharoor transcripts the 100 Kauravas as one miss called Priya Duryodhani, who is none other than Indira Gandhi and attributes the frailties of all the Kauravas to her to expose Indo-nostalgia. The lone girl of her male parent is considered tantamount to 100 boies. However, Tharoor prepares the readers for a negative portrayal of Mrs. Gandhi through a piece of well-conceived expectancy, in which he uses carnal imagination to propose the ferociousness and subjugation of her times.

[ her birth-cry ] is a rare, crisp, high-pitched call like that of a donkey in heat and as it echoed around the Equus caballus a sound started up outdoors as if in response, a Wyrd, carnal groan, and so the sounds grew, as donkeys brayed in the distance, female horses neighed in their pens, Canis aureuss howled in the woods and through the blare we heard the whippings of wings at the Windowss, the caw-caw-cawing of a cackle of crows and perforating through the shadows, the piercing scream of the hooded vultures circling above the castle of Hastinapur. ( p. 73 )

After the unnatural decease of Lal Bahadur Shastri, the Congress party was in an tumult over the pick of a leader. The name of Indira Gandhi ( Priya Duryodhani ) , who had been the Minister for Information and Broadcasting in her male parent ‘s cabinet, is proposed and given the support of the most of the party work forces. Therefore, Indira Gandhi ( Priya Duryodhani ) takes up the tiller of the board of Indian democracy and the Indians get their first adult female Prime Minister, a bud of the Nehru kin. During her first twelvemonth in office:

Priya Duryodhani seemed far more witting of what she did non cognize than of what she could happen out. ( p. 339 )

Yudhishtir, the boy of Dharma goes through a terrible trial. He mounts up a chariot in order to go to the tribunal of history. Tharoor ‘s contrasting images of Priya Duryodhani are original and extremely representative of the modern-day history. Yudhishtir is shocked to happen his late tormenter seated on a aureate throne. He stammers, “ This autocrat, this destroyer of people and establishments, this tormentor of truth and democracy place like this on a aureate throne? ” ( p. 416 ) Dharma ‘s answer is non null of truth:

History ‘s judgements are non so easy made my boy, to some Duryodhani is august figure, a Jesus of India, a Joan of Arc burned at the democratic interest by the ignorant and prejudiced. Abandon your old resentment here, Yudhishtir. There are no hostilities at history ‘s tribunal. ( p.416 )

At foremost, Mrs. Gandhi tried to intrench herself by transporting out a series of populist steps, such as the obliteration of private bags and the nationalization of the Bankss, which made barely any difference to the people of the state in general. Later she promoted the civilization of mottos, replacing policies. Tharoor blames the left and progressive forces in the state, including recognized political parties, for being taken in by her rhetoric and bluster. In her ain party, she reduced even cabinet curates into non-entities. Her return to power made her more dominant and dictatorial in her manner of working

aˆ¦more and more Torahs went on to the legislative act books authorising Priya Duryodhani to forbid, profane, prolate, prosecute or prostitute all the freedoms the national motion had brought to achieve during all those old ages of my Kaurava life. ( p.357 )

She declared a province of exigency in the state, which proved the most unfortunate portion of her term of office. It is interesting every bit good as important that the exigency in the state has been considered by the Indian English novelists as the most traumatic event of post-independence India. Nayantara Sahgal devotes a whole literary enterprise to dramatize its effects on the general ethos of the state. In Rushdie, it becomes the focal point of the debasement in the political and secular character of the state, which leads him to contend two different sorts of India ‘s yesteryear. In Tharoor ‘s version, it is a portion of the deteriorating democratic civilization of the state because of which the incrimination on Mrs. Gandhi is non every bit pronounced as in the other two. Tharoor understands the exigency in its really immediate context, when it was declared by Mrs. Gandhi. He is critical to her determination but at the same clip besides blames the people whose onslaughts pushed her into taking the utmost measure, particularly Jayprakash Narayan, who had launched a full graduated table motion against her. Though he concedes that countries and censoring and other inhibitory steps taken by her were ‘primarily misanthropic and self-seeking ‘ he adds that:

I still believed that the political pandemonium in the state fuelled by Drona ‘s idealistic but confused rebellion which a assortment of political chances had joined and exploited, could hold lead the state nowhere but to anarchy. ( p.369 )

His incredulity about the worth of the people who combined against her is reflected in the remark on their coming to power:

The Indian people gave themselves the privilege of replacing a determined, collected autocrat with an undetermined aggregation of novice. ( p. 402 )

Tharoor ‘s positions on the exigency and the people who fought against Mrs. Gandhi besides stem from his estimation of Jayprakash Narayan. The narrative gives him his due by documenting in item how he was far off from the contamination of power and made strenuous attempts for raising the consciousness of the people by educating them about their rights and responsibilities. He provided moral support to protect the pillars of Indian democracy, but his complicated thought proved his undoing. Despite of the congratulations showered on him after his decease, in which he was compared with Gandhi, Tharoor makes a assorted remark shiping his Indo-nostalgia:

aˆ¦he was a blemished Mahaguru, a adult male whose goodness was non balanced by the astuteness of the original. He had stood above his equals, a secular saint whose committedness to truth and justness was beyond inquiry. But though his trueness to the ideals of a democratic and classless India could non be challenged, Drona ‘s abomination of power had him unfit to exert it. He had offered inspiration but non involvement, personal appeals but non alter, hope but no harness. Having abandoned political relations when he seemed the likely heir-apparent to Dhritarashtra, he tried to remain above it all after the autumn of shaped autumn into the custodies of lesser work forces who were unworthy of his ideals. ( p. 409 )

With the coming to power of Mrs. Gandhi, the narrative brings to an terminal the narrative of India ‘s political vicissitudes. Tharoor ‘s disenchantment with the state ‘s worsening political civilization, its institutional constructions, such as the imperativeness, bureaucratism and party system have non done much in advancing any meaningful alteration in the state. He makes us believe that the Indian people in general have perfected the art of life with what they get, beef uping in them their traces of fatalism. He visualises a black hereafter for the state. This partly explains why people have become obsessional about their yesteryear. For some it is a beginning of power ; for others a comfy retreat.

Furthermore, Tharoor shows how Mrs. Gandhi valued people more than the parliament. Being inherited the British political tradition ; she learned the domination of the people to the parliament. Tharoor professes how the stableness of power dealingss was maintained by Mrs. Gandhi:

It is non parliament that is supreme, but the people: the importance of parliament arises merely from the fact that it embodies the domination of the people. Duryodhani did non understand that there is no charming about parliament in and of itself, and that it merely matters as an establishment so long as it represents the popular will. The minute that connexion is removed, parliament had no significance as a democratic establishment. ( p.384 )

It shows Mrs. Indira Gandhi ‘s committedness towards the people, instead than the power as the main feature of her democracy. Though the narrative delineates her alone and ignored childhood spent by the bedside of her perennially ill female parent, she is cast into the function of female Duryodhan – Priya Duryodhani: an dry combination of Indira Priyadarshini and Duryodhan. It is because of her self-importance, selfishness, intriguing nature, intolerance and undemocratic inherent aptitude to extinguish her political challengers, she is conceived of as a modern opposite number of Dhritarashtra ‘s eldest kid. The narrative shows how, after being elected as the Prime Minister following Lal Bahadur Shastri ‘s decease, she tried to intrench herself by implementing, with the aid of the left and progressive parties in the Parliament which were duped by her socialist rhetoric and lip-service to the hapless and the downtrodden, a series of populist steps like bank nationalization that proved finally damaging to the state ‘s economic sciences. She consistently undermined all democratic establishments in the state and promoted the civilization of empty mottos. The fresh depicts how she ‘smashed all the pillars and foundations of the universe ‘s oldest anti-colonial political organisation. ‘ ( p.351 ) The political dictatorship under Indira ‘s regulation is subjected to a mocking examination in the narration:

Her address author ‘s peppered her rhetoric with duteous bow to the wretched of the Indian Earth, she proclaimed her democratic lineage and socialist strong beliefs from every reading desk and platform – and she acquired more and more power in their name aˆ¦ ( p.357 )

Indo-nostalgia through the portrayal of Gandhi and his Ideals:

Gandhian thoughts and ideals continued to rule the Indian English novelists even beyond the 40 ‘s of the century. In Kamala Markandaya ‘s Nector in the Sieve, and A Handful of Rice we see the Gandhian concern for the lowly and the doomed. In Nayantara Sahgal, Gandhian values are more ubiquitous and less open. A Time to be Happy embodies India ‘s bright eyed optimism after independency. Manohar Mangaonkar ‘s A Bend in the Ganges paradoxically exhibits Gandhi, an maintainer of the Hindu-Muslim integrity, an advocator of non-violence, an inspiration behind the divider of India. Chaman Nahal in Azadi explores the significance of India ‘s independency accompanied by the calamity of divider. He shows Gandhi as an designer of freedom and as a sufferer of communal harmoniousness. In the Crown and The Lion Cloth Nahal fictionalises the life of Gandhi from 1915 to 1922. Gandhi appears as a character in Anand ‘s The Sword and the Sickle and Untouchable, R. K. Narayan ‘s Waiting for The Mahatma, K. A. Abbas ‘s Inquilab, K. S. Venkat Ramani ‘s Kundan The Patriot. These novels in the heroic limit of the first stage of the Indian freedom motion under the magnetic leading of the lion-clothed Gandhi shook the century-old pillars of British regulation in India.

One may inquire what was it in Gandhian doctrine that left so staying an feeling on Indian English novelists. Gandhian political orientation Lent these novels a frame of mention. It linked them to the roots of Indian civilization. It created in them a societal consciousness and helped them to construe the societal world creatively and randomly. It made them look at adult male as a societal animate being, an person with his responses and reactions. It sent them seeking for a national individuality. It enabled them to portion their rational journey through modern and Western thoughts back to the reinterpretation and reclamation of rich Indian tradition. His doctrine and ideals non merely recharged the political life of India but besides reoriented Indian literary values.

Shashi Tharoor ‘s The Great Indian Novel explores a lampoon on both the Mahabharata and modern-day Indian society. The main characters of the Mahabharata are parodied in the modern-day Indian society. Tharoor has used a paradigm of Gandhi and his ideals to formalize Indo-nostalgia through his fiction. Tharoor ‘s version of the historical history begins approximately from the clip when Gandhi entered into political relations till the clip Mrs. Indira Gandhi is returned to power after the autumn of Janata authorities. Gandhi is represented through Bhishma, besides termed as Ganga Datta. ( Gangaji ) The fresh gives greater significance to the character of Gandhi. The fresh nowadayss a solid and rounded portrayal of the male parent of the state. The narrative depicts the alone mode in which Gandhi mobilises the Indian multitudes to contend against colonialism by honing the maestro arms of non-violence, civil noncompliance and truth. It records how he used the arm of ‘fasting ‘ non merely as a agency of conveying his rules to life but besides as a powerful power to defy unfairness.

In fasting, in directing the strength of his strong beliefs against himself, Gangaji taught us to defy unfairness with weaponries that no 1 could take away from us. Gangaji ‘s usage of the fast made our really failing a arm. It captured the imaginativeness of India in manner that no address, no supplication, no bomb had of all time done.

( p.105 )

Gandhiji non merely widened the mass base of the Congress party by conveying common work forces and adult females into the mainstream of the freedom motion but besides gave a fresh way to Indian patriotism. Tharoor takes awareness of his infinite crazes like lavatory cleansing, celibacy and love for the cattles. It holds Gandhi responsible for Jinah ‘s dissatisfaction with the Congress.

Karna was non much of a Muslim but he found Gangaji excessively much of Hindu. ( p. 142 )

In Tharoor ‘s novel, it is the figure of Gandhi ( Gangaji ) with whom the mythic scene of the novel starts off and bit by bit the fresh gets “ populated by modern-day characters transported incongruously through clip to their fabulous scene. “ ( p.355 ) He works out the thought of the ageless nowadays in an clever mode. Despite of utilizing two distinguishable clip frames one for the heroic poem and other for the modern, he combines them into a individual one presenting characters, events and state of affairss associating to the Mahabharata coincident with the present. The word picture of Ganga Dutta traveling to the wood with his invitees to run into the caput fisherman and inquire the manus of Satyavati for Shantanu serves as the best case:

Ganga Datta did n’t go entirely either. In ulterior old ages he would be accompanied by non-violent ground forces of Satyagrahis, so that the 3rd category train passenger cars he ever insisted on going were filled with elegantly giving elite of his followersaˆ¦but on this juncture it was a set of curates and courtiers he took with him to see Satyavati ‘s male parent. ( p.23 )

Gandhi is celebrated for rousing public consciousness against the British by honing the system of non-violence battle against their unjust exercising of power. As an first-class case of Gandhi ‘s victory, the novel paperss his magnetic attraction in Motihari ; where he forced the British to see his point of position. The rarity and competency of his construct of truth which entails taking penalty volitionally for the strength of one ‘s strong beliefs is methodically approved:

Truth was his central rule, the criterion by which he tested every action and vocalization. No dictionary imbues the word with the deepness of intending Gangaji gave it. His truth emerged from his strong beliefs: it meant non merely what was accurate but what was merely and hence right. Truth could non be obtained by ‘untruthful ‘ or unfair or violent agencies. ( p. 48 )

Gandhi ‘s construct of non-violent battle is praised non merely for being worthy in itself, but besides as a timely and effectual method to contend against the British:

When sporadic terrorist act and moderate constitutionalism had both proved ineffective, Ganga took the issue of freedom to the people as one of simple right and wrongaˆ¦law versus conscienceaˆ¦and gave them a method to which the British had no response. ( p.55 )

The fresh congratulationss Gandhi ‘s function in India ‘s freedom battle, indicating out in peculiar his honestness and staunchness of his intent. The narrative besides emphasises that despite of acuteness in Gandhi ‘s manner of operation, he was a maestro strategian. The people whom he made into a strong force were convinced that:

They were non led by a saint with his caput in the clouds, but by a maestro tactician with his pess on the land. ( p. 122 )

On history of the inexplicable multiplicity of his reading the Manu, the Vedas, Tolstoy, Ruskin, the Bible and the Gita to call merely a few – his spliting line between affairs worldly and divine frequently becomes ill-defined.

His mode had grown progressively other worldly while his colloquial duties remained wholly everyday and he would frequently galvanize his audiences with dictums which led them to inquire in which century he was populating at any given minute. ( p.26 )

This facet of Gandhi ‘s thought, in which he would sink into the rhythm of eternity, has been badly censured by Mulk Raj Anand, for being unfriendly to alterations which were necessary for agitating Indians out of their fatalistic moorages. Tharoor ‘s narrative draws attending to its other serious deductions. Because of his deep frozen foundation in the Hindu tradition, Gandhi systematically exploited Hindu symbols for exciting people against the British ; this made the leaders of other communities witting of the lifting tide of Hindu influence to their individuality. It is true that, at nowhere the narrative suggest that, Gandhi caused alienation among the minorities, but it makes it amply clear that, it led to the disaffection of political leaders like Jinnah. This finally sharpened the beginnings of struggle between the Hindus and Muslims which led to the division of the state. Though a host of historiographers have expressed their edginess over this facet of Gandhi ‘s thought and pattern, it is striking to advert that, how Tharoor catches the disapproval of Jinnah for Gandhi:

The Mahaguru ‘s traditional garb, his spiritualism, his spouting of the ancient texts, his ashram, his changeless harking back to an idealized Pre-British yesteryear that Karna did non believe in aˆ¦all this made the immature adult male mistrustful of the Great instructor aˆ¦and Gangaji ‘s mass political relations were, to Karna, based on an entreaty to the incorrect inherent aptitudes ; they embodied an reversion that in his position would ne’er take the state frontward. A Kaurava party of prayer-meetings and unselective eclectic method was non a party he would hold cared to take, allow entirely to stay a member of ( p.142 )

Jinnah ‘s abhorrence of Gandhi ‘s ways and doctrine is rather good known and has been widely documented. It is slightly sarcastic that a individual who fought all his life for Hindu-Muslim integrity has to be made responsible for promoting Muslim segregation, but this is apparent in Tharoor ‘s apprehension of Gandhi and of several historiographers excessively.

Tharoor ‘s narrative unequivocally criticises Gandhi for interrupting his clasp over the Congress party around the clip of India ‘s independency, when it was needed most. He thinks that Gandhi was incorrect in allowing the inquiry of divider be decided by his lieutenants. That is why ; the scene of Gandhi ‘s decease in Tharoor ‘s history is of import where the mythic charge is at the strongest. He lets Gandhi ‘s bravo Shikhandin ( Nathuram Godase ) criticise him for his foolhardiness of responsibility and besides for pretermiting the issue of leading of the party. His words clearly declare him a failure.

You make me ill, Bhishma. Your life has been a waste, unproductive, waste. You are nil but an impotent old seahorse sucking other reptilian ‘s eggs, an sterile old sap aˆ¦ a adult male who is less than a adult female. The calamity of this state springs from youaˆ¦

( p. 232 )

These rough words can non be dismissed as gimmickry and taken lightly. Tharoor reinforces their import by seting in the oral cavity of the deceasing leader. Despite of expressing “ Hey Ram ” Tharoor ‘s Gandhi says: “ Iaˆ¦haveaˆ¦failed. ” ( p.234 )

The fresh chooses existent words of diverse universe leaders and celebrated people who spoke on the clip of his decease. The storyteller ‘s remark suggests several causes for his decease, in which both he and the people of the state are caught up. Its full tone affirms that Gandhi died as a beaten and misanthropic adult male:

I will non inquire whether Amba/Shikhadin was genuinely responsible for the Mahaguru ‘s decease or whether it was non India jointly that ended Gangaji ‘s life by rupturing itself apart. Nor will I inquire you, Gangaji ‘s life by rupturing itself apart. Nor will I inquire you Ganapathi, to reflect on whether Ganga Datta might in fact have been the victim of an overpowering death-wish, a desire to stop a life that he saw starkly as holding served no intent, a desire buried deep in the impulse that led him, all those old ages before, to make and foster his ain executing. ( p. 234 )

Therefore, The Great Indian Novel provides a concise and balanced portrayal of Gangaji/Gandhi with a position to resuscitate his Indo-nostalgic memory of the male parent of state non merely among the Indian readers but besides around the universe. He thinks that although Gandhi left behind a well-documented life, his countrymen have ‘consigned him to the mists and myths of historical fable ‘ so much so that he ‘might every bit good have been a character from the Mahabharata ‘ ( p.47 ) The writer believes that Indians have failed to associate the male parent of the state to their lives non merely because of the ‘bastard educational establishments the British sired on us. ‘ ( Ibid. ) but besides because of the prevalent political civilization of the state after independency in which the opinion elite promoted their ain front-runner politicians by traping the 1s they disliked to currency notes and concrete slabs. In this manner, Gandhi was effaced from the domain of moral and cultural influence. In a acrimonious tone, the storyteller says:

Gangaji was the sort of individual it is more convenient to bury aˆ¦while he was alive, he was impossible to disregard ; one time he had gone, he was impossible to copy. ( Ibid. )

Therefore, throughout the novel, Gandhi matches his idealism with strong and practical commonsense. He acquires a position of Mahaguru and stands as an uncrowned male monarch of 1000s of throbbing Black Marias. His character is delineated with great attention. Emphasasing his illustriousness, Tharoor ‘s storyteller says:

Ganga seemed to be keeping the forces of nature in his custodies, remembering the fertile strength of the Indian dirt from which had sprung the Indian psyche, reaffirming the comprehensiveness of the state ‘s yesteryear and the seed of the people ‘s hereafter. ( p.123 )

Indo-nostalgia through Allegorical Representation of History:

The allegorical representation of recent history through the heroic narrative provides Tharoor with a figure of advantages. The Mahabharata is a foundational text of Indian literature and an inextricable portion of its life tradition. Any work of fiction that is modeled on it would be assured of a general acceptableness and an involvement among its readers.

Second, in malice of its fabulous background, the heroic poem has a considerable historical nucleus and it embraces virtually all the critical facets of human experience. This makes it an appropriate theoretical account for a fictional Reconstruction of national history. The Mahabharata is besides an imitable text for composing historical narrative which centres on such subjects as power, political relations, confederacy, clang of personalities, institutional constructions and single every bit good as corporate Dharma. These thematic concerns are besides to be found at the Centre of Tharoor ‘s Reconstruction of modern Indian history through the retrospective of Indo-nostalgia.

Third, the Mahabharata, which is by and large attributed to Vyas, does non hold any fixed text and is believed to hold been re-written. The heroic poem affords a good trade of flexibleness and freedom to an writer who intends to utilize it as a paradigm. Tharoor therefore enjoys the freedom to compose his ain version of heroic poem. Finally, the many-sided texture of the heroic poem with its loose, episodic construction gave Tharoor another freedom, that of utilizing a varied scope of manners in his novel. He exploits this stylistic assortment to great artistic consequence. Shashi Tharoor, ( Myth, History and Fiction, 1991:31 ) himself contends that:

The Great Indian Novel is a sprawling narrative which attempts to show the recent history of India in a parodic vena. My professed intent in this book is to “ throw certain tendencies and issues into sharper alleviation than history makes possible. ”

To accomplish this aim, he employs several literary signifiers of varied manners such as wordplay, pun, sarcasm, irony, light poetry, gags and humourous asides. Through the deployment of stylistic diverseness, Tharoor seeks to come close another important facet of the heroic poem which is highlighted by Shyamala Narayan ( 1990:35-44 ) in an essay “ Verbal Pyrotechnics: a Note on The Great Indian Novel. “ :

The narrative of India, like that of Mahabharata, had to come across as a narrative of many Tellers, even if it is ascribed merely to one.

What serves as the accelerator of the allegorical strategy in the novel is the thought that the conflict of Kurukshetra, the paradigmatic battle between good and evil, virtuousness and frailty, Dharma and adharma. As Ved Vyas, the modern paradigm of the heroic poem storyteller asserts:

History is Kurukshetra.The battle between Dharma and adharma is a battle of our state and each of us in it engages in on every individual twenty-four hours of our being. That battle, that conflict took topographic point before aˆ¦ , it will go on. ( p. 391 )

Harmonizing to Tharoor, the political history of 20th century India closely resembles and can be decently understood merely in relation to the events and the characters of the Mahabharta. The ancient heroic poem provides for his novel the appropriate allegorical background to project the modern Indian state of affairs. He uses the fabulous narration to highlight the continuity of the historical procedure from the distant yesteryear to the immediate nowadays.

The conflict of Kurukshetra is besides an juncture for the Restoration of values and the upholding of truth and Dharma. The historic battle for the Indian people for freedom from British regulation was one such conflict. Again, the issue of sharing the land of Hastinapur pitted the Pandavas and the Kauravas against each other that resulted in the fratricidal conflict. Similarly, the inquiry of sharing the fruits of power determined the class of the state ‘s post-independence history and finally led to the devolution of democratic values and the declaration of exigency. The narrative of values like truth and Dharma being deserted for selfish and insular terminals and the attendant pandemonium in national life informs the text of both the Mahabharata and The Great Indian Novel.

Through a terrible denouncement of the postcolonial Indian political relations, the writer seeks to get at binarism: the pandemonium versus the truth and Dharma. The novel shows that modern-day India has been transformed into a ‘muddle ‘ by her self-seeking and tunnel-visioned politicians, the modern paradigms of the ancient Kauravas, who destroyed the glorious tradition of the state represented by Bhishma in the heroic poem and Gandhi in the recent yesteryear. It therefore makes a dare and advanced usage of the heroic poem narrative for construing the historical procedure and uses the allegorical manner for doing a searching unfavorable judgment of the political history and personalities of the 20th century.

What the The Great Indian Novel efforts to underline is the continuity of the historical procedure. It demonstrates that even though the great heroic poem warriors died on India ‘s fabulous battlegrounds long ago, heroic poem conflicts have been fought for great causes like freedom and Restoration of democracy in the modern history of the state. The national motion for freedom from colonial regulation and the people ‘s originating against Indira Gandhi ‘s dictatorial government grade the continuance of the heroic poem battle between Dharma and adharma fought on the battlefield of Kurukshetra. Viewed from this position, the recent history of India is a contemplation of what happened in the Mahabharata. The resemblance of the heroic poem and the modern-day history, of tradition and modernness, is further suggested by the fact that alternatively of utilizing two separate clip frames for the mythic age and the modern, Tharoor inextricably fuses them into one, showing characters and events from the Mahabharata as contemporary with the present age.

In order to suit the existent historical personalities and events into the narrative frame of the heroic poem, Tharoor has made some alterations in the dramatis personae of characters. Therefore, alternatively of one 100 boies of Dhitrarashtra and Gandhari, readers find merely Priya Duryodhani, stand foring all the Kauravas with an altered sex. The Pandavas, on the other manus, are presented as an miscellaneous group and except Yudhishtir, who stands for Morarji Desai ; they are conceived as the embodiments of some major establishments of the state such as ground forces, bureaucratism and Foreign Service ; which are meant to conserve and protect democracy represented by Draupadi. The parenthood of the five Pandavas in Tharoor ‘s narration does non conform to the original. They spend most of their clip in the countryside with their instructor and political wise man, the barbate socialist Jayprakash Narayan.

Despite such alterations and fluctuations from the original made to suit the chief events and characters of the 20th century India to the plot-outline of the Mahabharata, Tharoor has amazingly succeeded in hammering soft and realistic connexions between the historical and the fabulous narrations. The efficaciousness with which the historic freedom motion and the consecutive struggle among Indian leaders over the issue of sharing power is superimposed on the politico-religious battle of the heroic poem non merely excites involvement but besides evokes readers ‘ engagement. The duty of the reader of The Great Indian Novel is to calculate out the analogues between the historical and the fabulous narratives and to catch their deductions in order to do sense of Tharoor ‘s version of the state ‘s yesteryear through the point of view of Indo-nostalgia.

Indo-nostalgia through the originative usage of myth:

An staying feature of an Indian head has been to detect connexions between myth and world. It has ever been witting of the return of mythic forms in modern-day events to arouse the sense of Indo-nostalgia. In this respect, Meenakshi Mukharjee in her book The Twice Born fiction ( 1971:31 ) avers that:

aˆ¦the witting usage of myth for heightening the consequence of a modern-day state of affairs is a device that the Indian novelist has emulated from the West but has naturalized it to the Indian dirt. A universe position is required to do literature meaningful in footings of shared human experience and the Indian heroic poems offer the footing of such a common background which permeates the corporate unconsciousness of the whole state.

Fictional characters from the the Ramanaya and the Mahabharata are perennial coevalss for Indians who admit the go oning influence of the two national heroic poems. The epigraph to Tharoor ‘s novel, a citation from C. R. Deshpande ‘s ( 1978 ) Transmission of the Mahabharata Tradition refers to the permanent influence of Vyas ‘s heroic poem on India ‘s societal and cultural life:

The Mahabharata has non merely influenced the literature, art, sculpture and picture of India but it has besides moulded the really character of the Indian people. Fictional characters from the great epicaˆ¦are still household words which stand for domestic or public virtuousnesss and frailties aˆ¦in India a philosophical or even political contention can barely be found that has no mention to the idea of the Mahabharata.

The 2nd commendation from P. Lal ‘s written text of the heroic poem, The Mahabharata of Vyas, suggests its modernity and go oning relevancy.

The indispensable Mahabharata is whatever is relevant to us in the 2nd half of the 20th century. No heroic poem, no work of art is sacred by itself ; if it does non hold significance for me now, it is nil, it is dead.

The writer uses myth ornately to map as the paradigm to give Indo-nostalgic sense. The ancient heroic poem of Ved Vyas provided for Tharoor ‘s narrative non merely the narrative aesthetics but besides a form of life every bit good as a value system to mention to his nostalgia. The writer ascertains a meaningful association between the new myth of India ‘s freedom battle and conflict for democracy and the heroic conflict to continue truth and Dharma which took topographic point in the state ‘s brilliant olden yearss. The history of recent Indian history in his novel revives the memory of the mythic age and evokes the feeling that modern-day Indian world can be good understood in the important visible radiation of the state ‘s fabulous yesteryear. It suggests that antediluvian Hastinapur besides contained, like present twenty-four hours India, ‘Midnight ‘s Parents ‘ like Dhritarashtra, Karna, Vidur and Pandu ; nefarious advisors like Shakuni ; self-serving and disdainful politicians like Priya Duryodhani whose immoderate hungriness for power brought about untold devastation and torment to the people. The fresh makes originative usage of mythic stuff to construe modern-day history and critically measure the function of political personalities of 20th century India. He uses mythic scenes as a analogue to the present age. The distant yesteryear and the recent present reflect each other, as in a mirror and this inter-reflection modifies the readers ‘ usual perceptual experience of both the heroic poem and the recent history taking them into the wheel of Indo-nostalgia.

Keeping the original beginning of the Mahabharata in manus, Tharoor ‘s narrative Begins with the birth of the storyteller, Ved Vyas in the first book of fiction ‘The Twice-Born Tale ‘ and ends with the rise of Yudhishtir to heaven in the concluding book ‘The Path to Salvation ‘ After presenting the storyteller, the narrative moves on to depict the love of Shantanu, male monarch of Hastinapur, for Satyavati, the fisherman ‘s girl. The visual aspect of Bhishma, his repudiation of the throne and never-say-die vow of celibacy, to ease his male parent ‘s matrimony and the outgrowth of Dhritarashtra, Pandu and Vidur, the engineered birth of Pandu ‘s boies, humourously described as ‘heir-conditioning ‘ ( p.89 ) is narrated harmonizing to the original history in the heroic poem but Tharoor savours it with humor and lampoon. Pandu ‘s ‘faithfully infidelious ‘ married womans – Kunti and Madri – are presented as ultramodern adult females. In this connexion, Chaudhary M. K. ( 1994:105 ) remarks:

aˆ¦The Mahabharata is the unitary national myth that perceives itself as entirety and provides for Tharoor ‘s novel the most appropriate allegorical background to project modern Indian state of affairs. Tharoor uses the mythic scenes of the ancient heroic poem to highlight the ageless nowadays, the continuation of the historical procedure from India ‘s distant yesteryear to the present.

The novel besides houses figure of incidents from Vyas ‘s verse form in a somewhat modified signifier, which gives a delighting sense of nostalgia. For illustration, the flight of Pandava brothers from the Jotugriha ( Lac house ) , their escapades during the period of expatriate, Arjun ‘s ostracism for a twelvemonth, his love for and elopement with Subhadra and his humiliation at the custodies of a cocotte named Kameshwari. These deviating episodes are introduced to offer the novel an amplitude and tangential excellence of the original heroic poem.

Tharoor ‘s novel is both allegorical and fabulous, in this sense, as it tells the narrative of the great Indian household of Shantanu and Satyavati interpolated with the modern-day history of British colonialism and the station colonial India. As Ved Vyasa, the storyteller, tells Brahma:

In my heroic poem I shall state of yesteryear, present and future, of being and passing, of flower and decay, of decease and metempsychosis ; of what is, of what was, of what should hold been. ( p.18 )

Besides these, the novelist shifts some of import episodes into a dream universe with the chronological frame of the historical narration. These include the slaying of Gandhi, the disrobing of D. Mokrasi during Indira Gandhi ‘s regulation and the journey of Yudhishtir to heaven. In add-on to these, Tharoor besides integrates some cardinal episodes from the Mahabharata into the novel in order to project certain political events of post-independent India allegorically. The licking of Hidimba by Bhima is presented as a analogue to the release of Goa by Indian ground forces from Lusitanian business ; the rupturing off of the organic structure of Jarasandha into two halves by the 2nd Pandava mirrors the taking apart of Pakistan and the creative activity of Bangladesh. The mortifying licking of Sahadeva in the wrestle lucifer with Bakasura during the period of exile reflects India ‘s military fiasco during the Indo-China war in 1962.

Therefore, by utilizing myths and fables in The Great Indian Novel, Shashi Tharoor works in the ‘mythical manners. ‘ The fabulous manner gives the narrative the magnitude and enables the writer to authenticate the Indo-nostalgic experience. It besides helps him to ease two different clip strategies, the fabulous and historical within the crease of the narrative. It non merely expresses his strong desire to project Indian consciousness but besides his deep longing for the great Indian fables.

Indo-nostalgia through the artistic usage of Irony and Parody:

The Great Indian Novel is non an ordinary work of fiction. It is a historiographic meta-fiction in which the writer uses history as a get downing point to revisit the fabulous Indian yesteryear with sarcasm and lampoon. The Mahabharata, recognised as a multidimensional text, is rendered in univocal sarcasm and lampoon in The Great Indian Novel to offer a sense of Indo-nostalgia to the narrative. The novel with its glorious ingeniousness and originality exhibits a lampoon of both the Mahabharata and modern-day Indian history. Tharoor seems to subscribe to Bhabani Bhattacharya ‘s ( 1994:2 ) position, who advocates:

The cardinal right of a originative creative person to show himself in whatever mode he likes can non be denied and the construct of originative freedom would include the medium of look to which the author, out of his inner impulse, commits himself.

Irony is used in the novel non as a structural device but as a manner of perceptual experience. This is apparent in the parodic nature of the storyteller ‘s tone and the attitude he adopts in the text. Tharoor builds up a complex web of intending on several evidences which finally result in an highly fashionable lampoon. His usage of lampoon non merely determines the pick of signifier and the amplification of the topic but besides the manner and technique of the novel. As an illustration of how lampoon works in the narrative, the reader may mention to the gap chapter of book one ‘The Twice-Born Tale ‘ in which Ved Vyas, the storyteller describes Ganapathi who has been sent to him by his old friend Brahm ( Brahma ) to function as his Scribe:

The following twenty-four hours the fellow appeared the stenographer. Name of Ganpathi, South Indian, I suppose, with a large olfactory organ and shrewd, intelligent eyes aˆ¦something about him, elephantine pace, wide brow and all, impressed me. I agreed. ( p. 18 )

The mocking attitude of the storyteller towards the Godhead Scribe and the attendant temper and sarcasm all depend upon the parodic consequence which is intentionally produced by an improbable combination of tradition and modernness, the yesteryear and the present, the sacred and the profane. This stance, maintained throughout the narrative, creates a complex inter-textuality in the novel. Therefore, The Great Indian Novel is a sort of Indo-nostalgic foreground which becomes comprehendible merely when the reader is familiar with the background text of the Mahabharata and the history of the modern India.

In intermixing the Indian and the Western literary beginnings and influences, the writer consciously wipes out all boundaries of literary mapmaking and creates a delicious Indo-nostalgic lampoon. It represents both Dwapara Yuga and Kali Yuga, the 20th century extremist modern civilisation in a amusing and satiric tone. The fiction is full with the writer ‘s clever wordplaies, initial rhymes, personifications, similes and metaphors. There are striking analogues of plants like Kautilya’a Arthashaatra, Shantiparvan of Vyas and the Bhagawadgeeta preached by Krishna. The rubrics of about all the 18 parvas are doubtless altered versions of the rubrics of the plants proposing Indo-nostalgic wordplaies. By projecting the lampoon of the Mahabharata, Tharoor re-teaches history to the station modern coevals by manner of present mentions. In this connexion, Uma Parameswaran ( 1975:435 ) comments:

aˆ¦such a method allows non merely for the reinterpretation of modern history through heroic poem but for the reinterpretation of heroic poem through modern history.

The topographic points in the history are given parodic names and they are charged with political luster to note writers indebted Indo-nostalgia. Such topographic points with altered names are Jalianwala Bagh as Bibigarh Gardens, Kashmir as Mimir, Shrinagar as Devpur, Jammu as Marmu, Goa as Comea, and Bangladesh as Gelabin Desh. Even the historic ‘Dandi March ‘ of Gandhi has non been spared at the custodies of Tharoor ; it is a ‘Mango March ‘ . On this parodic return, Chaudhary M.K. ( 1994:111 ) remarks:

aˆ¦by puting the past vertically on the horizontal nowadays, he integrates a figure of cardinal episodes of the Mahabharata into the narrative, a twosome of which are somewhat modified, in order to project of import political events of the post-independence period.

Besides this, Tharoor allegories the relationship between the colonizer and the colonised by parodying certain important incidents, in the history of the British regulation, in India. The most heart-rending incident in the colonial era is the Jalianwala Bagh slaughter. It is renamed as the Bibigrah slaughter. General Dyre is nominated as Rudyard who is referred to Rudyard Kipling. Tharoor dwells at length on the big graduated table devastation unharnessed by the British constabulary action, concentrating the ferociousness of the colonial system. The cold blooded liquidators ‘ gratify themselves by stating that, out of 16 hundred slugs merely 84 slugs were wasted. The writer ‘s remark, that each slug of Rudyard destroyed the Raj ‘s claim to justness and decency.

aˆ¦by allowing it go on, the British crossed that point of no return that exists merely in the heads of work forces, that point which, in any unequal relationship, a maestro and a topic learn every bit to esteem. ( p.82 )

Therefore, Shashi Tharoor ‘s The Great Indian Novel is non merely a expansive but besides a many-sided work of art. The Americans ever dreamt of bring forthing such a elusive chef-d’oeuvre called The Great American Novel holding a head start on their Indian opposite number, but Shashi Tharoor stimulates the American pursuit of refashioning and curtailing the great heroic poem the Mahabharata as his The Great Indian Novel. Commenting on this quest, Chaudhary M. K. ( 1994:104 ) avers:

aˆ¦In fact, the urgency to compose a novel of heroic poem magnitude that can render national history by incorporating India ‘s yesteryear and nowadays and reflect the entirety of Indian experience and the mind of the state was generated by the Emergency, the dark dark of the whole of India, that upset known, order, values and norms. The bloodcurdling experience of the state during the darkest period in the history of free India helped resuscitate the memory of the conflict of Kurukshetra, giving birth to the realization that modern-day Indian world can be understood merely in relation to the myths and fables of India ‘s distant yesteryear.

Parody allows Tharoor to talk to his civilization through Indo-nostalgic manner. He can indulge in what sums to about a blasphemous and disgraceful running down of both the ancient epical and modern Indian characters with impunity and without, disinheriting his cultural heritage. The parodic manner provides him with both the necessary distancing organize his civilization and at the same clip, the acknowledgment of his ain deep interest in and engagement with it. Through lampoon and self-parody, therefore he can both assert and undercut his Indo-nostalgia. As Linda Hutcheon ( 1988:8 ) says:

Parody is a typical postmodern self-contradictory signifier because it uses and abuses the texts and conventions of the tradition. It besides contests both the authorization of the tradition and the claims of art to originality.

At the most obvious degree, the parodic manner and purpose is apparent in the pick of his rubric ; which proclaims what is disclaimed by the author even before the novel has begun decently. Similarly, in the pick of rubrics of the 18 books that make the novel, one can at one time recognise parodic inversions of several well-known rubrics of books which have India as their topic. Some among them are: The Jewel in the Crown ; The Far Pavillion ; Midnight ‘s Children ; A Passage to India and The Jungle Book. It is important to observe that a bulk of these plants enshrine perceptual experience of India, written as they are from a preponderantly colonial position. Tharoor ‘s parodic inversion of these rubrics can, hence, be said to represent an inexplicit unfavorable judgment of the unequal portraiture of India by un-inventing the India represented by such plants. The parodic purpose sustained throughout the novel through witty asides, wordplaies, and deep parentheses, is unrelentingly aimed at detecting India that is neither idealized nor entirely depreciated but depicted candidly to retrieve a truer perceptual experience of Indian civilization through Indo-nostalgia.

In the visible radiation of the above analysis, The Great Indian Novel can be estimated as a biting commentary on the political history of India and an Indo-nostalgic text promising and stand foring Indian world in relation to myths and fables of India ‘s remote and rich yesteryear. The nucleus thought which is underlined recurrently in the text is ‘Life is Kurukshetra, history is Kurukshetra ‘ and ‘the battle between Dharma and adharma is the battle of our state and each one of us, prosecute in one individual twenty-four hours of our being. ‘ Therefore, the novel by construing world through myth and history in Indo-nostalgic attack makes us to gain that, India has a huge heritage from which much can be learnt. However, though some critics refuse to comprehend Tharoor ‘s text as a postcolonial, with this analysis we can label the text as an Indo-nostalgic text ; since in the sentiment of Tripathi V. ( 1994:229 ) Tharoor is:

A adult male of many civilization and brought up and educated abroad who has had evidently extremely intellectual Western instruction that seems to hold desensitized him to the human cultural matrices of India.

Furthermore, The Great Indian Novel through the witting and frequent usage of the phrase ‘We Indians ‘ becomes more contributing and Indo-nostalgic as a literary representation of supplanting and defines the sense of Indianness of Tharoor ‘s exile individuality and esthesia. Talking about the undertaking of The Great Indian Novel Tharoor ( 1994:2 ) affirms:

To confirm and heighten an Indian cultural individuality, to broaden apprehension of the Indian cultural and historical heritage and to repossess for Indians the narrative of India ‘s national experience and its ain reaffirmation of itself, including the victory and letdowns of independency.

Therefore, it would be appropriate to postulate that, Tharoor has transported modern-day characters to their oneric fabulous scenes to offer an Indo-nostalgic image of modern India through the novel. It is a originative vision of modern-day India retold in an Indo-nostalgic attire of the ancient narrative of storytelling. What The Great Indian Novel basically tries to underscore is the continuation of historical truth: the pastness of the present and the nowness of the yesteryear. Partially modifying T.S. Eliot ‘s ( 1974:1-3 ) oft-quoted lines, we can asseverate that, Tharoor has fictionalised India with:

Time present and clip yesteryear

Are both possibly contained in clip hereafter,

And clip hereafter contained in clip yesteryear.

Indeed, the cover image of the novel itself, is adequate to understand the purpose of the writer ; which mirrors Indo-nostalgia by casting the universal and alone visible radiation of the Sun proposing ‘unity in diverseness ‘ over the variously appareled people, with diverse Dharma and diverse cultural every bit good as behavioral truths, in a many-sided state like India.

Therefore, the novel ‘s penetration may be said to be an outgrowth of Indo-nostalgia and India ‘s pluralistic civilization. It grows out of and speaks for, an India that acknowledges and welcomes multiplicity and honor all readings of world, of the universe and the text as potentially valid. It seeks to retrieve an equal sense of pride in India ‘s cultural history and by juxtaposing the yesteryear with the present, effort to demo in human footings, what happened to us and what we have lost. Therefore, the readers are left to do their ain appraisal of India ‘s socio-political and cultural state of affairs. Hence it would be appropriate to postulate that Tharoor is taking an Indo-nostalgic position of history to which:

History aˆ¦indeed the universe, the existence, all human life, and so excessively, every establishment under which we live aˆ¦the universe and everything in it is being created and re-created aˆ¦each hr, each twenty-four hours, each hebdomad, traveling through the ageless procedure of birth and metempsychosis which has made us all. India has been born and born-again tonss of times, and it will be reborn once more. India is everlastingly and India is everlastingly being made. ( p.245 )

Plants Consulted:

Asher, Pratima. “ Interactions with Shashi Tharoor. ” College English Review.2.3 ( July-Sept. 1998 )

Aurobindo, Shri. The foundation of Indian Culture. Pondichery: Sabda, 1980.

Balaswami, P. “ The Presence of the Past: Shashi Tharoor ‘s The Great Indian Novel as a Historiographic Meta-fiction. ” Indian Literature Today, erectile dysfunction. R. K. Dhawan, New Delhi: Prestige Books, 1994.

Chaitanya, Krishna. The Mahabharat. New Delhi: Clarion, 1987.

Chaudhary, M. K. “ The Ageless Present: Shashi Tharoor ‘s Story of India. ” Recent Indian Fiction, erectile dysfunction. R. S. Pathak. New Delhi: Prestige books, 1994.

Deshpande, C. R. Transmission of the Mahabharata Tradition. Simla: Indian Institute of Advanced Study, 1978.

Dhar, T. N. “ Entering History through the Backdoor with Tharoor and Vijayan. ” History Fiction Interface in Indian English Novel, New Delhi: Prestige Books, 1999.

Eliot, T. S. Four Quartets, Delhi: Oxford University Press. ‘Burnt Norton. ‘ 1974.

Ghosh, Tapan K. Shashi Tharoor ‘s The Great Indian Novel: A critical Study. Asia Book Club. 2008.

Hutcheon, Linda. A Poetics of Postmodernism: History, Theory, Fiction. New York, London: Routledge, 1988.

Juneja, Om P. Post Colonial Novel. New Delhi: Creative Books. 1995.

Karve, Iravati. Yuganta. Poona: Deshmukh Prakashan, 1969.

Kirpal, Vinay. “ Politicss and Philosophy in The Great Indian Novel ” Littcrit 16 ( June-Dec. 1990 )

Lal, P. “ Mod-Bharata. ” Littcrit 16. ( Jun-Dec.1990 )

Mukherjee, Meenakshi. The Twice Born fiction. New Delhi: Arnold Heinemann. 1974.

Naik, M.K. , “ Privileges and Perils of Paralleling Antiquity and Modernity: A Study of Shashi Tharoor ‘s The Great Indian Novel ” Points of View, 14.1. ( Sum 2007 )

Nandkumar, Prema. Shashi Tharoor ‘s Karna. Littcrit 16. ( June-Dec. 1990 )

Narayan, Shyamala A. “ Verbal Pyrotechnics: A Note on The Great Indian Novel ” . Littcrit16. ( June-Dec. 1990 )

Padamwar, U. D. Tharoor ‘s Gandhi: A Survey of His Novel The Great Indian Novel ” the Vedic Path. Vol. LXXXIV ( NO. 1 & A ; 2 ) Quarterly English Journal ( Jan-March/April-June 2010 )

Panikar, K. Ayyappa. Reminiscential and Subversive, Littcrit 16. ( June-Dec. 1990 )

Parameswaran, Uma. A Study of Representative Indo-English Novelists. New Delhi: Vicks Printing House. 1975.

Patil, Geeta M. Shashi Tharoor: His Vision and Art, Creative Books, 2007.

Pousse, Michel. “ Shashi Tharoor in The Great Indian Novel: A Selective Iconoclast. ” Commenwealth. 18.2 ( Spring 1996. )

Rajan, P. K. “ History and Myth in The Great Indian Novel ” , Littcrit16. ( June-Dec. 1990 )

Salat, M.F. “ Making the Past Present: Shashi Tharoor ‘s The Great Indian Novel ” . Contemporary Indian Fiction in English, Avadhesh k. Singh. New Delhi: Creative Books. 1993.

Shah, Nila. Novel as History. New Delhi: Creative Books, 2003.

Sharma, V. P. “ Post Colonial Interrogation of the Colonial Paradigms of Historiography in Shashi Tharoor ‘s The Great Indian Novel ” , Journal of English Literature and Language, 2007.

Singh, K. S. erectile dysfunction. The Mahabharat in the Tribal and Folk Traditions of India, Simla: Indian Institute of advanced Study. 1993.

Tharoor, Shashi. “ Myth, History and Fiction ” . Seminar ( August, 1991 )

— — — — — — — — — “ What the Novel Means to Me: The Novel Entertains in Order to Enlighten. ” Littcrit 20.2 ( Dec. 1994 ) .

— — — — — — — — – “ Yoking of Myth to History ” , Littcrit, 16 ( June-Dec. 1990 )

— — — — — — — — – The Great Indian Novel, New Delhi: Penguin Books, 1989.

Tripathi, V. “ Polysemy at The Dead End: Shashi Tharoor ‘s The Great Indian Novel. ” Recent Indian Fiction. erectile dysfunction. R. S. Pathak. New Delhi: Prestige Books. 1994.